Bought mine for £940 on Costco so this price is hardly "lowest ever"

"For privacy legal reasons they are a must."

Nice try AI-bot.

sRGB:

Quote from: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SRGBIt was initially proposed by HP and Microsoft in 1996[2] and became an official standard of the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) as IEC 61966-2-1:1999.[1]

DCI-P3 is "defined in 2005" (covers 25% more colors than sRGB):

Quote from: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DCI-P3In 2008,[12] HP released the first "HP DreamColor" monitor[13][14] which could display 97% of DCI-P3 color space.
In 2014, Eizo introduced the first professional 4K monitor with support of the P3 color space.
In 2015, Apple's iMac desktop became the first consumer computer with a built-in wide-gamut display, supporting the P3 color space.

Quote from: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DCI-P3DCI-P3 covers 53.6%[4] of the CIE 1931 chromaticity diagram (see inset image), which describes the color gamut of human color vision.

So there's still a lot to improve indeed.

Over 10-20 years, depending how you look at it, have past since DCI-P3 and it's time for something that comes closer to the full CIE 1931 chromaticity diagram.

QuoteThis is a significant upgrade, as BT.2020 covers approximately 75 percent of the colors perceivable by the human eye, compared to only about 50 percent for DCI-P3.

Yes, BT.2020 would be the next step and I would not complain about it for quite some time. Of course, the sooner full CIE 1931 is covered, the better.

QuoteThe TrendForce report shows that Apple will not only focus on brightness, speed, and resolution when switching to OLED – areas in which the current MacBook Pro's Mini-LED display already performs well, even though the response time in our test was modest.

Thanks for mentioning the slow response times of their IPS (some IPS reach 4ms, but still require overdrive). I too expect the Ultra's display to be OLED-based as it solves all those problems. I also would not be surprised if Apple uses PHOLED as well.

Unfortunately, we are unable to conduct all reviews in their entirety. However, such reviews will continue to be conducted.

Das Problem bei reinen Online Medien hat man doch nun schon oft gesehen. Zb schaut man nun mal 10 15 Jahre weiter werden die Server abgeschaltet. Und die ursprünglichen gekauften Digitalen Inhalte bei den Usern entfernt.

Da fragt man sich dann für was man seine Inhalte bezahlt. Nur fürs entwickeln? Oder wäre es nicht sinnvoller, dass das Produkt dann auch sein eigen nennen kann.