Quote from: Prassel on Today at 14:19:54Doesn't matter though, because Intel and AMD have made a decision (or so it seems), which is that they have no interest in that, and instead want to sell the good iGPUs only soldered into laptops, mini-pcs, probably because they make more money with it. It's all about the money again ...
The whole comment is true and accurate, you said it all well, but the answer to this is simple - because cheap dGPUs for desktops will still outperform anything that an iGPU can offer. For less money.
The old RX 7600 is 231€ brand new in the EU (Germany), and it is noticeably faster than the B390:
https://www.notebookcheck.net/Radeon-RX-7600-vs-Arc-B390-Panther-Lake-iGPU_11600_13268.247598.0.htmlIf you up your budget to 360€, you get the 9060 XT with 16 GB VRAM and even more performance over the B390:
https://www.notebookcheck.net/Radeon-RX-9060-XT-vs-Arc-B390-Panther-Lake-iGPU_13070_13268.247598.0.htmlSo for desktops, you can save tremendous amounts of money - which you won't spend any time soon on the electricity difference by going with a 100-150W TGP dGPU (because those dGPUs idle at 0.5 to 3W and they work at full TGP only in full load, usually in gaming, but if you game 20 hours per day then you have other problems in your life, I'd argue) - and still completely wipe the floor with the B390 (or any other iGPU), plus get far greater CPU performance (also for less money).
A desktop about 2.5x faster than the X9 388H + B390 is also not just upgradable for the future but also about 45% less expensive (which you can use to get a beautiful 27" 4K/FHD dual mode 240/480 Hz display, and still have a lot of money left). Sure, you can't carry a desktop around but then getting an expensive iGPU for desktop to get less performance than cheaper dGPU - matters even less. It's easy to put an iGPU in a laptop, but the same is not possible with a desktop GPU (eGPU setup as the only option).