Quote from: opckieran on Yesterday at 20:12:21Once Intel releases their Halo APU, AMD better have RDNA 5 at the minimum, because even RDNA 4 wasn't that big of a performance boost over RDNA 3! So AMD better be sweating bullets at this point.
True, in RDNA4 AMD only added FP8 hw and called it a day. Also the big question is if AMD is going to support INT8 hardware based upscaling that RDNA3 could at least do, tho with a decrease in quality compared to FP8, but still better than the previous non-hw-based upscaling. Also, RDNA4 may have no transformer upscaling support (NVIDIA added transformer based upscaling not too long ago) and it's an another reason to avoid even RDNA4. AMD really needs not only bring CUDA-like support but also bring it to all their cards, including consumer products, just like NVIDIA has it already for a long time, so not even RDNA5 is the target, but CDNA.
That loser nothing comment before this one isn't by me. Maybe it's someone who bought AMD iGPU and wanted to use hardware based quality upscaling and found out that only RDNA4 can do that, but not even as good as NVIDIA can, because NVIDIA switched to a transformer model based upscaling.
Of course, it would be better for everyone if AMD would catch up.