Edit: my results say designed capacity: 70mwh
And full charge capacity (remaing) is down to 56mwh

That is incorrect, in Europe Asus has increased the prices with 70% from 1200 to 2000 euro for the basic model A14

The Zenbook duo went from 1700 euro to 3300 euro.

Those prices are crazy because these laptops are medior laptops they are not top models , because they only have 32gb ram , no dedicated graphic cards , and only 1tb ssd.

For 2000 euro you can have much much better laptops. I think you better wait 6 months that prices go down (black Friday).
Because now it's just a scam.

Dell and HP euro increased prices but not by 70%

I bought the Asus A14 last year and diary from battery life is not such a good laptop.
Many compatibility issues.
For ai lmstudio still can't detect the GPU or npu... Because prism can't solve fiber problems.
And using VPN software is also a problem because the tap driver that VPN software requires does not exist for arm64
When the VPN uses prism convertor my battery life goes from 15h to 8hours.
And the battery life went down from 100% to 80% in 11 months... According to Asus this is normal to loose 20% per year the first two years... It's acceptable they say, and the warranty was only 6 months on the battery even with the extended warranty that I purchased. They would only have replaced it if I lost 30%

The weird thing is that the battery health indicator in my Asus has been altered to lie (hide the defect). If you use the windows tool "powercfg /batteryreport" you will see the real degradation.
It's weird that there are no lawsuits yet for these battery problems and trying to conceal them in their software...

Ist doch auch kein Wunder dieses testergebnis. Der ältere ist ein typische 8 Kerner und der neue ein 6 Kerner, also Äpfel mit Birnen Vergleich. Eigentlich ist der neue kein Ryzen 7 sondern ein Ryzen 5. AMD geht mal wieder den Weg der AMrketingverwirrung/-Lüge. Weiß nicht warum immer jemand glaubt, dass das Image darunter nicht leidet und AMD trotz sehr guter Leistung immer der 2. CPU Konstrukteur bleibt. Gute dinge müssen nicht beworben werden, scon gar nicht mit Übertreibungen. AMD verkauft nur sein Image permanent unter Wert durch solchen Marketingunfug. Seitdem Intel nicht mehr die Taktkrone anstrebt und einfach mehr Kerne verbaut, sind sie eindeutig wieder die bessere Wahl, trotz ständiger unnötiger Sockelwechsel.