For designers, content creators, and video and 3D editors, this is the best portable laptop for work. I'm keeping an eye on it to see how it arrives in Europe because these laptops never go cheap here.

@Florian: Nur mal ein 👍🏻 für die klare Kritik für's Weglassen des 3.5 mm Klinkenanschluss in diesem "neuen" Xiaomi Modell. Für mich ist die jetzt fehlende Möglichkeit, ein Headset mit Klinke anzuschließen, ein klares Manko.  Leider wird die Abwesenheit dieser Anschlussmöglichkeit auch bei sogenannten Flaggschiff Smartphones oft gar nicht erwähnt. Bitte auch weiterhin die Abwesenheit des Klinkenanschlusses monieren, wenn ein Smartphone das nicht hat!

Und an alle, die meinen, "ohne Klinke" sei wegen der Wasserdichtheit nötig: das ist ein Gerücht. Es gab und gibt Smartphones mit Klinke und auch microSD Slot, die IP68 zertifiziert sind.

Medicaid's, correct, with any such mini-PCs, one pays the price for it being so small.

Since you mentioned it, leme quote:
LLMs
The "Strix Halo" APU is a 256-bit chip with a theoretical memory bandwidth of 256 GB/s (256-bit * 8000 MT/s / 1000 / 8) (and ~210 GB/s practically (expected)), comparable to an entry level quad-channel (4 * 64-bit) workstation' memory bandwidth. A normal desktop PC is dual-channel at best. AMD specifically advertises "Strix Halo" for running/inferencing LLMs. You can run the same LLMs on any PC, if you have at least the same amount of RAM (well, running off of a SSD will also work, but the speed will be super slow), ATX sized or not, dual-channel RAM or not, the differences are:

• The size: This is 2.5 to 4 Liters, depending on the Strix Halo chassis.
• The RAM speed at which any LLM will be running at: Strix Halo is a quad-channel chip at 8000 MT/s vs a normal PC, which is dual-channel at 5600 MT/s to 6200 MT/s (2*64-bit*6200/1000/8 = 99,2 GB/s)). A (mini-)PC based on the "Strix Halo" APU will run a LLM about 2.5 times faster: 256 GB/s / 99.2 GB/s = ~2.58.
• The RAM upgradability: The LPDDR5X RAM in "Strix Halo"-based PCs is not upgradable, but it runs at 8000 MT/s vs 5600 MT/s to 6200 MT/s typically seen in DDR5 UDIMMs. A DDR5 UDIMM version with upgradable RAM may appear later, but it's not going to be at 8000 MT/s, like the soldered ones. CUDIMM may reach 8000 MT/s.

Questions to ask yourself:

• Is the LLM speed difference of 2.5 times (150 %) and the price worth it vs simply getting 2x48GB RAM sticks or 2x64GB RAM sticks for a fraction of the price and having then more RAM (although, yes, slower) vs paying 2400 bucks and being stuck with the hardware and no upgrade path (on a desktop you could upgrade to 4x64GB)?
• And, if the size matters, you can still get a mini-ITX case, AM5 mini-ITX motherboard and build a PC of the same size (or get a pre-built mini-ITX PC), with the possibility to:
   
  
  • Upgrade the RAM.
  • Having a dedicated GPU. For 4.0 - 4.5 Liter mini-ITX builds: RTX 4060 LP or RTX 5060 LP), and both are still better and faster (and harder, stronger, hehe) than the built-in iGPU in Strix Halo. And if you are ok with a 5.5 Liter case, then you can even fit a normal/full-sized 4060 Ti 16GB / 5060 Ti 16GB or 5070 (rumor: 18 GB VRAM option in 2026's Refresh using 3 GB GDDR7 chips, instead of the current 2 GB ones - a 50% increase in VRAM density). A 5070 Ti SUPER 24 GB VRAM may fit too.
    
    • You get the ability to upgrade the GPU later, like when/if in 2026 the Refresh GPUs come out, using 3GB, instead of 2GB, GDDR7 chips and you get 50 % more VRAM in the same size.
    • A dedicated GPU (4060 / 5060) will also have much faster prompt processing (pp), since it's much faster than the iGPU (think of it in terms of gaming performance (higher FPS = higher pp).
    • The ability to partially or fully offload to the fast VRAM of the GPU (5060: 448 GB/s) for much faster token generation (tg), where the memory bandwidth is key.
    • A dedicated GPU adds additional, very fast, memory capacity to the RAM.
    • And, not LLM related, but: You can also game with higher FPS if you add a GPU that is faster than Strix Halo's iGPU (between RTX 4060 Laptop (=RTX 4050 desktop, which doesn't even exist, this is how bad it would be (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GeForce_RTX_40_series)) and RTX 4070 Laptop (=RTX 4060 desktop)).
  • Having 24 PCIe 4.0 lanes vs Stix Halo's 16 PCIe 4.0 lanes. Just know that some non-normal CPUs have only 16 PCIe lanes, instead of the full 24.
  • Repairability.
  • And, if looks matter, there are many arguably better looking mini-ITX cases, too.
   
• A normal mainstream AMD AM5 B650 / B850 mobo, using 2x64 GB dual-channel 6000 MT/s RAM + a RTX 4090 (1 TB/s bandwidth) will have similar token generation (tg) speed as a Strix Halo, then layers are also offloaded to the 4090, and much faster prompt processing (pp) than Strix Halo' 4060 Laptop iGPU performance.

This seems like a paid promotion.

Essentially, for the price of an Apple laptop with the same 40 TOPS + mobility and a screen and thunderbolt 5...you can get a mini pc with mediocre at best I/O options.

Heck, you could build a better PC for less. Or, get a different mini PC + an external GPU with many times more TOPS for about the same price.

I don't see how this is a deal in any case...just seems like it was ridiculously overpriced to begin with and is now just stupidly overpriced.