Recent posts
Pages 1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 ... 10
#43
Last post by NINJATHEORY - Today at 17:30:52
What's the processor ? Since the Trump band Huawei has been using old processor it's like paying a premium for 4 year old tech and today's prices it's simply not worth it
#45
Last post by Fuckmusk - Today at 17:02:17
Why? How? The man should have been sued to oblivion by now for all the lying and cheating he's done. And it was just him who destroyed their worth with the cyberdump and doge.
Hyperloop, solar roof tiles, the boring company, and so many more things that were complete lies and if anyone invested in that crap can and should sue him. It was all fake. The self driving is bullshit and extremely dangerous. So far hundreds have died and thousands injured because it but Tesla's are designed to disable self driving right before the accident actually happens so they can claim it wasn't on.
I hope musk snorts too much drugs and dies.
#47
Last post by GeorgeS - Today at 16:45:16
How silly can NBC's writing get here?
Just follow the money and the logic for a moment:
- all network devices have a unique number assigned at point of manufacture
- as long as the device is NOT sending data, it has ZERO impact on infostructure
- Garmins "inReach" makes use of the Iridum Sat network, Apple uses Starlink
while the cost of ETHER companies devices is NOT inexpensive Garmin has a history of not only putting functions and features behind a 'paywall' but also marketing "SatCom" devices that require a subscription to function.
Due to the 'zero cost until used' nature of the devices, Apple has merely (for now anyway) abandoned the revenue stream from the devices that Garmin counts on for survival.
Ether or both companies COULD switch to 'pay per use' however that would negate the consumer advantage Apple currently has for its devices and the company advantage Garmin has for its devices.
One thing is for sure, "free" vs "subscription" is kinda a no brainer.
#50
Last post by KritischerLeser - Today at 16:20:43
Ich finde, es hat ein Geschmäckle wenn bei dem Beitrag über "Geekom", dort u.A. der "beeindruckende Mini-PC" beworben wird. Das Gerät finde ich gut und es ist im Moment für ca. EUR 1630 über Kickstarter vorbestellbar. Was ich nicht mag, ist die Benennung der Werbung als "Entgeltliche Einschaltung". Was habt Ihr Euch dabei gedacht? "Hey, hör mal, komm wir nennen es 'entgeltliche Einschaltung', unsere Leser, das höchste Gut, was wir haben, 'raffen' das nicht, weil wir so clever sind und es 'entgeltliche Einschaltung' nennen statt 'Werbung' - wir sind sooo gut! Das wird den Werbeeffekt enorm steigern!" Ich finde es blöd, es erweckt den Eindruck, Ihr wolltet es gegenüber Euren treuen Lesern verschleiern. Denn wer nennt ernsthaft "Werbung" "entgeltliche Einschaltung"? Wozu? Doch nur in der Hoffnung, die eigenen Besucher über den Ursprung bzw. die Motivation des Beitrag in die Irre zu führen.
Pages 1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 ... 10