Very nice summaries at the beginning of the articles. Most tech sites put catchy phrases and clickbait there. Here, you get an actual quick jist of the review.

Der Preis ist sehr günstig, aber ohne künstliche Intelligenz hat dieses Tablet keine Zukunft.
Ich warte lieber darauf, dass der MINISFORUM V3 auf den Markt kommt, der 1.300 € kostet und sich an alle Eigenschaften anpasst, die ich an einem Desktop-PC habe, aber mit nur 1 kg Gewicht, ich habe die Kommentare auf YouTube gesehen und es hat mich sehr überrascht

Now this is a real laptop, the best hardware available, accommodated with adequate space for cooling, it also has a touchpad with physical buttons.

The biggest weak point is the low capacity battery.

As always, it's always the AMD models taking the hit...looks like it's the same screen on AMD P/T14(s) Gen 4s. I.e. no mentioning of refresh rate of the OLED panel -> the panel is in itself 90Hz but the OEM AMD drivers from Lenovo cap it at 60 in Windows. You'd have to overwrite with AMDs own drivers to get 90Hz at the cost of inaccurate colors. In Linux it works out of the box.

Then you look at their Intel models and it's 120Hz panels across the board. Lmao

Interesting again, as the 155H (Dell) can be compared to the 155U (Lenovo). The latter one has to be added manually.

Both are limited to the same TDP (24W), but the 155H has 8-Arc-graphics-cores and the 155U has 4-Arc-graphics-cores. The gaming results show, that the 155H is around 32% faster than the 155U. I also did that comparison between the HP Spectre and the Lenovo previously, and the results were similar.

Overall it's mostly only interesting regarding upcoming Arrow Lake desktop, which also gets 4-Arc-graphics-cores. If the full-sized iGPU version is only 33% faster than the half-sized iGPU version, then the desktop iGPU performance would be quite performant. Performant enough for casual gaming. Though not as good as the 8600G according to my guesstimation, but still a huge step up from the UHD 770.