With Silent Hill f ad, Xbox suddenly makes it clear that buyers don't own games with DRM

[Redaktion]

Xbox is now warning buyers that it's selling licenses to play games, rather than ownership. A Silent Hill f disclaimer is likely related to a California law regulating the sale of digital games. Xbox Game Pass highlights how downloaded titles may become unplayable at a marketplace's discretion.

https://www.notebookcheck.net/With-Silent-Hill-f-ad-Xbox-suddenly-makes-it-clear-that-buyers-don-t-own-games-with-DRM.1133587.0.html

[GeorgeS]

IMHO: the bottom line is that many IP owners wish to retain full control of their properties.

Re-releases & re-masters may often compete with earlier releases. However, if the IP owner is able to remove access to the earlier releases, THAT competition dissolves.

Given that studios & publishers are seemingly lacking in "new" creative effort or ideas, simply putting a "fresh coat of paint" on prior releases is becoming more popular.

Besides, if the "license" to use/play a title expired or was revoked, ANY actual use of it would be illegal and open to litigation - surely in the favor of the IP owner.

[TruthIsThere]

I'll just put this right here:

Microsoft's AI chief, Mustafa Suleyman, has stated that content published on the open web since the 1990s is considered fair use

Uhm... that goes both ways, M$! 😂

[Gallo123]

Given that we saw for example 74% of Ghost of Yotei buyers choosing digital in the UK, we are now in a generation of peak stupidity and most people don't care about the technicalities of ownership as long as you hook them up to IV, slurping Mountain Dew and munching Doritos.

I bet you in 10yrs time these same people will cry what happened.

[L]

It's also on gog, after purchase you get an offline installer to keep forever just like a physical copy.