The MSI Summit A16 and the Asus ZenBook S16 are built around similar AMD platforms, but the conclusions in both reviews couldn't be more different.
The Summit A16 review even references the ZenBook directly, yet despite the MSI outperforming the Asus in nearly every benchmark, the tone is noticeably more critical.
The ZenBook is called an "outstanding all-rounder" even though it runs hot, underperforms its hardware, and is clearly tuned for silence over speed. The OLED screen and thin chassis probably can't handle the thermals, which seems like a conscious trade-off.
Meanwhile, the Summit runs cooler, stays closer to full CPU performance, and handles sustained loads better. Yet the review feels like it's penalized for not being quite as thin or trendy.
Also, the "lack of a discrete GPU" feels like a reach. MSI segments its lineup. If you want a GPU, that's what the Creator line is for. The Summit is designed without one, and that's actually a plus for people like me who value better thermals, battery life, and acoustics in a work laptop.
Design matters, but so does intent and execution. This feels uneven.