Post reply

Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.
Message icon:


shortcuts: hit alt+s to submit/post or alt+p to preview

Topic Summary

Posted by: Phil888
« on: December 19, 2014, 23:13:22 »

What if I don't like Mac OS? than what do I buy? Mac OS does not do all what I want, than what?
Posted by: Certi
« on: November 09, 2014, 09:30:25 »

Hello, any chance that someone post a pic with difference of 1366x768 and 1920x1080..? Or to send me by mail, just want to see how big difference it is... thanks!
Posted by: Den kappekledde hevner
« on: August 03, 2014, 22:28:38 »

X240 has a significantly weaker CPU compared to 13" MacBook Pro Retina (15W vs 28W). X240 also has significantly weaker graphics (4600 vs 5100). Apple has a higher resale value. Apple's trackpad is vastly superior, and their keyboards are as good as Lenovo's. Most people hunt-and-peck type and will learn to hate Lenovo's pointing stick. You'll hit it again and again if you aren't touch typing.
Posted by: navyn
« on: July 20, 2014, 11:19:57 »

Buying a macbook pro 13 retina, better 16:10 screen ratio and keyboard
Posted by: FixItPls
« on: June 30, 2014, 10:39:52 »

No dedicated mouse buttons :(
No activity LEDs :(
sRGB 57% (+ reported image retention problems) :(
COST € :(
Posted by: adrian
« on: June 09, 2014, 13:36:01 »

well,lenovo made it, i bought a mac instead of another thinkpad.Thanks for destroying the thinkpad brand
Posted by: Redaktion
« on: June 06, 2014, 10:10:11 »

More pixels. After the WXGA version of the ThinkPad X240 could already show its qualities in our review, we now have a look at the high-end version with a Full HD display. But are the additional pixels really worth the premium price?

C 2018 » Impressum     Sprachen: Deutsch | English | Español | Français | Italiano | Nederlands | Polski | Português | Русский | Türkçe | Svenska