News:

Willkommen im Notebookcheck.com Forum! Hier können sie über alle unsere Artikel und allgemein über Notebook relevante Dinge disuktieren. Viel Spass!

Main Menu

Geologists blend "high-grade" iPhone to discover it contains 36 mg of gold and 900 mg of critical element tungsten

Started by Redaktion, March 25, 2019, 08:03:26

Previous topic - Next topic

Redaktion

Geologists at the School of Geography, Earth and Environmental Sciences at the University of Plymouth in England have blended an iPhone so they could scrutinize the elements it's made from more closely. Using their specialist knowledge and skills, the researchers found that the iPhone had enough gold and tungsten in it to be classified as high-grade.

https://www.notebookcheck.net/Geologists-blend-high-grade-iPhone-to-discover-it-contains-36-mg-of-gold-and-900-mg-of-critical-element-tungsten.415004.0.html

Theodore

Sorry if it seams a bit pessimistic (and sorry for my english) but recycling is not a solution as it consumes a lot of energy and because a significant proportion of the materials is lost (for exemple you loose 2/3 of 1 unit of cooper when recycled). It could be a good thing that reviewers starts to understand that it has been known for a long time (officialy since de 70's with The Limit to Growth report and there is a lot that has been written about it since then) and that this is a bit to late to think about it because litteraly nobody (industrials, politicians) did anything, we just continued in the wrong direction to make everything worse everyday... The only efficient solution that we know now is to consume much less but who is realy ready for this (even me, writing this from my asus laptop).

cyclist

Theodore & to all other experts:

We keep hearing a lot of energy is needed for recycling. But the amount of labor (especially child/illegally labor) & exploitation of environment needed for fresh extraction of metals is being avoided, then isn't that a big benefit. There are a lot of external costs associated to child/illegally labor & environment damage which if effectively calculated should be less than energy costs of recycling

In short even if takes more energy to recycle, there is an abundance of energy so wouldn't that be a good incentive for governments to support/legislate recycling ?

Quick Reply

Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.

Name:
Email:
Verification:
Please leave this box empty:

Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview