News:

Willkommen im Notebookcheck.com Forum! Hier können sie über alle unsere Artikel und allgemein über Notebook relevante Dinge disuktieren. Viel Spass!

Main Menu

Nvidia GeForce MX330 and MX350 in review: Known architecture - New name

Started by Redaktion, March 12, 2020, 22:28:41

Previous topic - Next topic

S.Yu

Quote from: JohnMac on March 14, 2020, 02:54:31
Quote from: S.Yu on March 13, 2020, 17:42:33
The power figures are again perplexing, it seems from the table that to boost 25 more MHz with 25% more TUs turned on, and double the memory bandwidth, the 1050 consumes 300% the power of the MX350.

At such low power consumption 300% isn't actually that much in absolute terms.

GDDR5 and controllers use a significant amount of power, and actual clocks are likely very different. Eg a 10510u with 4.9ghz boost isn't going to come close to a 7700k with similar advertised boost clocks.
The boost clocks are minimal anyhow, the base clocks are the same, unless you're saying the 25W model can't maintain its base clock on 25W? Same thing for controllers, double the bandwidth shouldn't even translate to double the power, of the GDDR5 alone, and that's an equal 2GB in each model.

Quote from: william blake on March 14, 2020, 09:16:20
Quote from: Jesse on March 14, 2020, 04:21:49
What is perplexing is why do people buy this crap?   Is it just a checkbox item to help market a laptop to rubes?
~30%~330% faster than igpu for 50-70 usd. great deal.

Agreed. Some(many) people don't have the budget nor the need to play the latest triple A titles at their intended resolutions and settings, and this low end part plugged in is notably faster than the best iGPUs in expensive models, and battery shouldn't be a significant concern in gaming.

Spunjji

Quote from: william blake on March 14, 2020, 09:16:20
Quote from: Jesse on March 14, 2020, 04:21:49
What is perplexing is why do people buy this crap?   Is it just a checkbox item to help market a laptop to rubes?
~30%~330% faster than igpu for 50-70 usd. great deal.


Where'd you get those numbers? The best I can see is the MX350 being 200% better than HD 610, which is not an achievement worth bragging about. It's also not really a "great deal" when considering how little extra a 1650 would add to the bill for a metric ton of extra performance.

The MX150 was a solid option when it released. 2 rebrands later and it's looking so old that the Vega iGPU in optimal Renoir configurations will equal its performance at 2/3 the total TDP (CPU + GPU).

william blake

Quote from: Spunjji on March 26, 2020, 10:30:45
The MX150 was a solid option when it released. 2 rebrands later and it's looking so old that the Vega iGPU in optimal Renoir configurations will equal its performance at 2/3 the total TDP (CPU + GPU).
2 rebrands later, the same distance between the fastest igpu and the fastest mx. whatever happens, nvidia makes the lineup for the best share and profits.
..jokes about apus breaking the laws of physics is not funny if you heard them a hundred times.

Quick Reply

Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.

Name:
Email:
Verification:
Please leave this box empty:

Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview