Ryzen AI 9 HX 470 vs. Ryzen AI 9 HX 370: More expensive but barely any faster

[Redaktion]

Early benchmarks for the Ryzen AI 9 HX 470 Gorgon Point are in and they're barely distinguishable from last year's Ryzen AI 9 HX 370.

https://www.notebookcheck.net/Ryzen-AI-9-HX-470-vs-Ryzen-AI-9-HX-370-More-expensive-but-barely-any-faster.1327087.0.html

[It's literally a rename]

This is because Ryzen AI 400 series is literally a rename/refresh of Ryzen AI 300 series. And, as opposed to AMD's slides, Ryzen AI 400 may not be any more energy efficient either?

[It's literally a rename]

Funny question: Can these Ryzen "AI" 400 chips be actually literally the original Ryzen "AI" 300 unsold stock piles chips with a different laser-engraved name on top of them and a rename in BIOS and firmware [to Ryzen AI 400]?

PS: I say "AI", because Ryzen AI is very slow at only 55 TOPS tops as the AI performance is based on the iGPU's performance and its access to only 90 GB/s*.

For comparison, a 4060 desktop has 242 TOPS (nvidia.com/en-us/geforce/graphics-cards/compare/).

* 89.6 GB/s = 5600 MT/s * 128-bit (2*64-bit, aka dual-channel) / 1000 / 8.