News:

Willkommen im Notebookcheck.com Forum! Hier können Sie über alle unsere Artikel und allgemein über notebookrelevante Dinge diskutieren. Viel Spass!

Main Menu

YouTube takes down Moore's Law Is Dead AMD Zen 7 leak, leaker calls it anti-free speech action

Started by Redaktion, Today at 12:40:38

Previous topic - Next topic

Redaktion

YouTube has taken down a video from Moore's Law Is Dead detailing AMD's future Zen 7 CPU architecture. Moore's Law Is Dead, known for leaking upcoming CPU, GPU, and gaming consoles, has claimed that the video takedown doesn't seem to be AMD's doing.

https://www.notebookcheck.net/YouTube-takes-down-Moore-s-Law-Is-Dead-AMD-Zen-7-leak-leaker-calls-it-anti-free-speech-action.1285414.0.html


Enma45

What interests me is AMD Zen 6 and laptops with Medusa Halo, which should be released in 2027. Zen 7, which won't be released for more than two years, doesn't interest me.
What we all want to know is that AMD Zen 6 will be released with RDNA 5, or at least that's what we hope, and that AMD will forget about using RDNA 4m and all that garbage that only makes them lose customers in the laptop market.
AMD, get your act together because in 2027 there will be five competitors selling laptops: Intel, AMD, Qualcomm, Apple, and Nvidia.
It's clear that AMD has to go after everyone with RDNA 5.

Very easy

What matters in the end for me as a consumer is: Does a successor Zen CPU give me minimum of 15-20+% FPS increase in 1440p, at the same power consumption, if yes, I'm going to upgrade, if no, I will wait for the successor and then check again.
Tho, that being said, nowadays I may prefer to spend the money on a 5070 Ti SUPER (the current non-super is a 16 GB VRAM card) (SUPER would be using 3 GB, instead of the current 2 GB per GDDR7 chip) (if it's still going to be released and not actually canceled, as per latest news), because of its 24 GB VRAM (16 GB VRAM / 2 GB * 3 GB = 24 GB) [at 256-bit] for AI / LLM as also its TDP isn't too high (~300W).

RobertJasiek

Youtube censors for various reasons, which might include alleged short-term view maximisation. Youtube does not implement free speech as understood in human rights or laws.

indyp

YouTube has never been a free speech platform, and thus cannot censor anyone. It has never claimed to have been one.

Print out or speak this information and give it out freely on street corners to people. THAT is free speech (at least in the U.S.)

And even then you can still be liable for copyright infringement, libel, slander, inciting a riot, public indecency, harassment, etc.

Free speech is quite narrow in actual definition.

Quick Reply

Name:
Email:
Verification:
Please leave this box empty:
Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview