AMD's Strix Halo in the new Asus ProArt PX13 is not an improvement for all users

[Redaktion]

Asus updated its compact 13.3-inch convertible ProArt PX13 and now uses AMD's high-end Strix Halo processors. Even though there are advantages in terms of CPU performance as well as RAM, the GPU performance is not much better compared to the RTX 4070 from the old ProArt PX13.

https://www.notebookcheck.net/AMD-s-Strix-Halo-in-the-new-Asus-ProArt-PX13-is-not-an-improvement-for-all-users.1239407.0.html

[davidm]

It takes so much credibility away from this site that it doesn't focus on the fact that Strix Halo has twice the memory bandwidth of other x86 laptops, and that's the main thing that makes it special.

[Terror Byte]

Author ignores the fact the Halo is an iGPU, and performs as well as a discrete GPU. Amazing from AMD. Pedal your rubbish elsewhere.

[Citizen_not_Consumer]

The author is ignoring the fact that the Halo iGPU has much better power/watt and performs as well if not better than the Nvidia model.

I can't believe that a technology writer can't see that!

The CPU multitasking is not even in the same ball park with the Nvidia + ryzen 370 model.

[nah]

Strix Halo' iGPU is RDNA3.5 and I'm not sure I'd buy an iGPU that can't do DLSS-like quality upscaling. Only the RDNA4 architecture can do that hardware-based ML upscaling (tho, NVIDIA's transformer model provides even better overall quality).

One could also see it this way: The 256-bit Strix Halo APU is using 8000 MT/s memory, but now, 9600 MT/s memory is available and is being used (by APPLE's M5 APU and INTEL's Arc B390). If Strix Halo would use the faster 9600 MT/s memory and is not limited by the memory bandwidth, then it could be up to 20% faster (9600/8000). So, maybe not using 9600 MT/s memory is hurting Strix Halo's per/W.