News:

Willkommen im Notebookcheck.com Forum! Hier können Sie über alle unsere Artikel und allgemein über notebookrelevante Dinge diskutieren. Viel Spass!

Main Menu

It’s time to kill slow fingerprint scanners on all phones over $300

Started by Redaktion, Yesterday at 19:41:39

Previous topic - Next topic

Redaktion

If you hate the fingerprinting scanner on your Android phones, you are not alone. Optical in-display fingerprint scanners on many $300+ Android phones remain slow and unreliable in 2026, often failing with wet fingers - even on phones from market leaders.

https://www.notebookcheck.net/It-s-time-to-kill-slow-fingerprint-scanners-on-all-phones-over-300.1233674.0.html

The Werewolf

0th world problem if I ever heard one, given that the average new cellphone price world-wide is $350.
Also, why even set a limit? "If you're too poor to own an expensive cellphone, then suffer with garbage phones!"
The price difference isn't parts anymore, it's markup. ALL new cellphones should have reliable biometrics, not just the expensive ones.

Worgarthe

Quote from: Redaktion on Yesterday at 19:41:39Optical in-display fingerprint scanners on many $300+ Android phones remain slow and unreliable in 2026
Nhf but I stopped reading right here because this is incorrect (to generalise as broadly as you did, at least). My phone (Nothing (3a)) unlocks as soon as I touch it even on a quick tap, faster than I can react. There is no perceivable delay when compared to my friend's iPhone 16 Pro and do I care if the 16 Pro unlock 2 ms faster (while both under 30 ms and no it is not faster because you have to look at it)? Absolutely not. It's as fast as both of my ThinkPads with their physical scanners - instant.

Quick Reply

Name:
Email:
Verification:
Please leave this box empty:
Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview