QuoteAfter all, didn't they skip rdna1 by going directly from vega to rdna2?
Indeed.
RDNA 1 en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RDNA_(microarchitecture):
desktop launch: Juli 7, 2019
+ 555 days or 18 months and 5 daysRyzen 5000 integrated mobile launch: Jan 12 2021
RDNA 2 en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RDNA_2:
earliest desktop launch: Navi 21: Nov 18, 2020
+ 412 days or 13 months and 17 daysRyzen 6000 integrated mobile 660M and 680M launch: Jan 4, 2022
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RDNA_3:
RDNA 3
desktop launch: December 13, 2022
+ 22 days to ~60-90 days
Ryzen 7040 "Phoenix" integrated mobile 760M and 780M announcement: January 4, 2023 (delayed to April?)
RDNA 3.5
(no desktop)
880M and 890M: Jul 2024
+ 184 to 214 days or 6 to 7 months
Strix Halo: Jan 2025
RDNA 4 en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RDNA_4:
desktop: February 28, 2025
+ 329 days to 419 days (average of last 3 integrated mobile launches)
Estimated integrated mobile RDNA4 960M / 980M / 990M launch: January 23, 2026 (probably at the CES 2026) to April 23, 2026Launch at CES 2026 is expected, but the rumor is that it's gonna be just a rename (with a maybe higher clock), like Phoenix to Hawk Point.
The question is:
What made AMD use RDNA3 in integrated graphics and why would AMD not use RDNA4 in 2026?RDNA4 in integrated graphics would be nice:
RDNA3 780M improves by 10-20% over RDNA2 680M, probably limited by memory bandwidth, which aligns with the memory bandwidth increase of 6400 MT/s (RDNA2) to 7500 MT/s (RDNA3).
RDNA3.5 uses 8000 MT/s. For RDNA4, AMD would need to use LPDDR5X-9533 MT/s memory. 9533 MT/s memory is available. Hardware-accelerated FP8 for ML upscaling seems to especially make sense in laptops, where one could then upscale 720p to 1080p.
RDNA 5 based on the desktop launches:
January 16, 2027 (using average) (CES 2027?)
May 27, 2027 (using pattern)
+ adding the 6 to 7 months from above
Medusa Halo: July 19 2027 to August 18, 2027