Laptop OEMs to allegedly shift away from Intel's underwhelming Meteor Lake and offer more AMD Ryzen 8000U/H models

[A]

It's funny when the stupid artificial bot "A" talks about AI. Would people appreciate the humor in this situation?

Lol you've completely degraded to running around the forum and simply trying to insult me. Feelsbad man, get help, I'm not the reason you are always wrong.

[shippp]

As I have written many times, serious, locally executed expert systems on neural networks require terabytes of RAM and even more disk space.

That is why in DCs the requirements for RAM on equipment for neural networks are growing exponentially. And Hynix in general has allegedly already taken 35% of the DRAM market thanks to the success of HBM, which is still not available either in embedded devices or in PCs/laptops.

Until HBM comes to PCs/laptops there will be no more sense in growing cores. They are suffocating with extremely slow DDR5 RAM (and DDR6 won't help).

The higher the HBM production, the lower the prices.

The RAM bandwidth has increased in desktops by about 4-5 times (overclocked, on average - 100-105GB/s), if we take it relative to the first coreI (Lynnfield), and multi-threaded performance has increased almost 10-12 times, i.e. . The memory should already be at least 2-3 times faster, i.e. from 200-300GB/s. Moreover, this speed should be available in laptops. In PCs from 500GB/s+ in the HEDT segment.

It is the slow RAM that forces Intel/AMD to hesitate with the introduction of DP2.0+/TB5/USB40 V2. But all three interfaces are in fact ALREADY outdated, because all three do not provide frame rates of at least 120Hz on 8k monitors, even for office work. And for 10 years now we have needed 8K monitors for offices with 300ppi+ at 27-32" with a smooth picture when scrolling even banal text and surfing. We won't even talk about games here.

This is how much progress on desktops and laptops has lagged behind smartphones, where 300+ ppi has been the norm for many years even for cheap smartphones. And therefore there are no problems with curve smoothing in the same filthy chrome, because... there it is not turned off, but there the shadows are simply not noticeable or there is normal anti-aliasing. Filthy Google, with the connivance of the stupid crowd, is ruining its vision on desktops - for everyone who uses (is forced to) Chrome and Edge.

It would be easy for us to get a sharp picture in all browsers without exception if we have 8K panels. This alone will be a huge progress for civilization, brought to its knees by the Evil Corporation, Google, on desktops and laptops.

What the hell is your deal? Why do you have such an obsession with PPI. Genuinely why do you think you need only 4k+ and 8k+ displays. You seem to have severe vision problems if you think you need 4K laptops and 8K monitors and 16K TVs  to be able to actually see what is on the screen. You will not die if the PPI is below a certain amount. You should know that you are such a strange person, you have very very specific niche needs but seem to spend all your time insulting people who point out that what you want or supposedly need is not the same as everyone else and is in fact slim edge case desires. And you also seem to think you need gaming level hardware but don't play games at all which is very weird.