To be so wrong about so many things but be so proud about it, impressive...
Quote from: NikoB on May 21, 2023, 17:50:32For accurate work with color, the screen is still not good - AdobeRGB coverage is only 85%, which is not enough.
🤣
AdobeRGB is needed for professional print as it covers all CMYK gamut perfectly, 75% is enough to use, 85% definitely more than enough, and 90%+ is needed only for specific Pantones. But in that case one will use a professional monitor such as the BenQ SW321C which is, check this now...
Quote from: NikoB on May 21, 2023, 17:50:3216:9 is extremely inconvenient both for the office and for YouTube (the controls run into the picture) and for Photoshop, where professional cameras generally shoot at 3:2.
...16:9 monitor! And is the most widely used monitor in professional photo editing and graphic design waters.
benq.com/en-us/monitor/professional/sw321c.html Then we have the very close second professional grade monitor - Eizo ColorEdge CG319X - with 17:9 aspect ratio. So, by your own definition, this one is even more
extremely inconvenient than 16:9 because, oh the horror, it is wider 😱
16:9 is inconvenient for Photoshop on small screens (under 14") with small resolutions and PPI under 150-ish. For everything else not a single sane person who uses it professionally is going to choose 16:10 over 16:9 or 21:9 (or 32:9) because it limits your usable area, as I demonstrated perfectly clearly before:
Quote from: Neenyah on May 20, 2023, 13:07:57All I can say is that Photoshop in 16:9 is far more usable than Photoshop in 16:10 (both same height, same scaling) 👉 imgur.com/X5XChaB
If
NOT HAVING tools all over your image is what you call inconvenient then ok, that's just trolling.
Quote from: NikoB on May 21, 2023, 17:50:32For the debaters above about ppi - taking into account the fact that under Windows in the most popular Chrome browser, non-disabled muddy fonts since version 50 due to incorrect (and not eliminated for many years) black and white text smoothing, which introduces shadows around letters (and they should not be with the correct anti-aliasing version, as in Windows XP, for example), all people sitting at screens with ppi below about 220-230 spoil their eyesight in Chrome (under Linux, this incorrect anti-aliasing, as I was told, can be disabled with the command key line, but this key does not work in Windows), and these are almost all PC/laptop screens with rare exceptions. With what I "congratulate" the owners of these devices. I personally read texts only in Firefox, where incorrect anti-aliasing can at least be turned off.
Until all screens are at least 230 ppi, the problem of fuzzy fonts will haunt all browser users and especially Chrome.
Update your GPU drivers and stop using TN panel. 210 PPI here, text is perfectly sharp and definitely not fuzzy at all in Microsoft Edge. Confirmed with fully zooming in with a camera to the point of clearly seeing each pixel - absolutely nothing is fuzzy.