News:

Willkommen im Notebookcheck.com Forum! Hier können sie über alle unsere Artikel und allgemein über Notebook relevante Dinge disuktieren. Viel Spass!

Main Menu

Motorola Moto G200 5G in review: 5G smartphone offers 144 Hz and a Snapdragon 888+ at a fair price

Started by Redaktion, February 16, 2022, 03:27:09

Previous topic - Next topic

Redaktion

On paper, the Moto G200 5G looks quite promising. On top of a fast 144-Hz panel, UFS 3.1 storage, LPDDR5 RAM and a flagship SoC, the Moto G200 has a built-in 108-MP triple cam and is powered by a 5,000 mAh battery. But once again there is an area, in which Motorola is lacking...

https://www.notebookcheck.net/Motorola-Moto-G200-5G-in-review-5G-smartphone-offers-144-Hz-and-a-Snapdragon-888-at-a-fair-price.599742.0.html

anon999999

Would it be possible to stop saying that the lack of PWM or high PWM frequency is not a problem? My g100 does not produce any eye strain with brightness over 65 %, but this G200 causes instant severe eye strain at any brightness levels.

At the forums there are many like me. It seems that they introduced FRC or dithering and a new source of flicker and it is as bad as the traditional PWM from 240 to 2400Hz. I had to return my g200 and keep using G100


Mauro

Thank You. I'm an happy user of the Motorola G100, and I was considering to upgrade to G200 because it's the only IPS flagship... Now I can skip it without hesitation.. Damn PWM, no phone change this year...

Quote from: anon999999 on February 22, 2022, 01:45:10
Would it be possible to stop saying that the lack of PWM or high PWM frequency is not a problem? My g100 does not produce any eye strain with brightness over 65 %, but this G200 causes instant severe eye strain at any brightness levels.

At the forums there are many like me. It seems that they introduced FRC or dithering and a new source of flicker and it is as bad as the traditional PWM from 240 to 2400Hz. I had to return my g200 and keep using G100

Johnhunter

Quote from: anon999999 on February 22, 2022, 01:45:10Would it be possible to stop saying that the lack of PWM or high PWM frequency is not a problem? My g100 does not produce any eye strain with brightness over 65 %, but this G200 causes instant severe eye strain at any brightness levels.

At the forums there are many like me. It seems that they introduced FRC or dithering and a new source of flicker and it is as bad as the traditional PWM from 240 to 2400Hz. I had to return my g200 and keep using G100

Have you tried the poco x4 gt? Or based on specs what do you think of it?

Quick Reply

Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.

Name:
Email:
Verification:
Please leave this box empty:

Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview