Willkommen im Notebookcheck.com Forum! Hier können sie über alle unsere Artikel und allgemein über Notebook relevante Dinge disuktieren. Viel Spass!
Started by Redaktion, May 24, 2022, 21:00:36
Quote from: chrisDo on May 24, 2022, 23:26:41why anyone would want a 2050 when 680M with LPDDR5 is not far behind in performance but is far ahead in battery life ?
Quote from: riklaunim on May 25, 2022, 01:15:59Quote from: chrisDo on May 24, 2022, 23:26:41why anyone would want a 2050 when 680M with LPDDR5 is not far behind in performance but is far ahead in battery life ?2050 should be way better than GTX 1650 so also better than 680M. It won't be groundbreaking but still... and it gives access to Nvidia technologies which may be a benefit to some. Plus the sticker to lure unaware customers ;)
Quote from: Crowl on May 25, 2022, 15:33:09Benchmarks seem to put the 680m ahead of a mobile 1650 and while the 2050 is better than either of them, it's lead is more marginal than "way ahead", so the previous commenter questioning the value of it at the expense of a fair amount of battery life has a very good point.
Quote from: Lorry on May 25, 2022, 23:07:27No, 680M should be roughly on par with MX570. GTX 1650 Max-Q is more than twice as faster in games and professional applications, and RTX 2050 is not even comparable to the AMD iGPU.
Page created in 0.011 seconds with 20 queries.