Leak unveils LG G6 and W6 OLED TVs with brand-new "Hyper Radiant" tandem OLED panel

[Redaktion]

LG's next-generation flagship OLED TVs are expected to be officially unveiled in just a few days, but a leak has already jumped the gun and offers many details of LG OLED G6 and W6, both of which will apparently sport a new "Hyper Radiant" tandem OLED panel.

https://www.notebookcheck.net/Leak-unveils-LG-G6-and-W6-OLED-TVs-with-brand-new-Hyper-Radiant-tandem-OLED-panel.1193381.0.html

[240 Hz OLED TV when?]

One more year of only 165 Hz?, while gaming monitors with the same panels (W-OLED (made by LG) and QD-OLED (made by SAMSUNG)) reach over 500 Hz and 1000 Hz already announced now. Come on, big TV makers, give us OLED TV gamers at least 240 Hz in 2026 IN MID-RANGE (not even the top line, in top line you can offer 360 Hz).
PS: I'm not getting an OLED with anti-glare coating as I want my text sharp and colors punchy.

RTINGS said in their YouTube video that the viewing angles in LG G5 are reduced due to the tandem panel. Let's see if it's fixed in the G6.

[Mike V]

RTINGS said in their YouTube video that the viewing angles in LG G5 are reduced due to the tandem panel. Let's see if it's fixed in the G6.

The G4's viewing angles were better due to the MLA tech. The G5 has similar viewing angles to all other OLED TVs, which is still very good. MLA improved viewing angles noticably!

[Bill]

Is there any indication that the 97 inch will get the same tech as the G6 in other sizes this year?  I see you included it but it's lagged years behind the other sizes technology updates in the past so I'm worried that the trend will continue but that it will still come in north of $20k despite that.

[heffeque]

240 Hz OLED TV?

I'm not really sure if that is really necessary.

Anything above 120 Hz seems like placebo.

Just get one of those silly "OVER 9000" Hz monitors and that's it.

[240 Hz OLED TV when?]

I'm not really sure if that is really necessary.

Of course, I play fast paced esport-like multiplayer game (CS2 custom servers modes) and even 144 Hz is often not enough. PS: I'm not playing at 4K either, so, no, to reach 240 Hz or more, one doesn't need a 4090, let alone a 5090, desktop.

Anything above 120 Hz seems like placebo.

Oh no..Why do you think there are 240, 360, 500 and soon more Hz? Do your own "research" by reading / watching Youtube vids. You can even start here: blurbusters.com/massive-upgrade-with-120-vs-480-hz-oled-much-more-visible-than-60-vs-120-hz-even-for-office. Especially with OLED's <1 ms pixel response times (and 4 ms for the fastest IPS (true 4ms and slightly lower, if counting bad overdriving results (also, so nice that OLED doesn't require any overdriving))), anything over 250 Hz is possible now, thanks to OLED.

[Chakra]

Of course, I play fast paced esport-like multiplayer game (CS2 custom servers modes)

But why do you wish play on a TV?  I'd think most CS players are on a monitors. They're cheaper and generally faster.

I'm not really sure if that is really necessary.

Anything above 120 Hz seems like placebo.

Usually, I would agree. But when it comes to OLEDs, the higher the better to compensate or mitigate any pwm side affects there maybe.