Samsung has released its Galaxy S23 Ultra and there will be many wondering if the smartphone is worth its US$1,199 price tag, especially when the Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max can be had for US$1,099. A popular tech tipster has offered up 10 differences between the two flagships that arguably leave the S23 Ultra looking like a better buy even at the higher price.https://www.notebookcheck.net/Galaxy-S23-Ultra-vs-iPhone-14-Pro-Max-Tipster-lists-10-perceived-buffs-that-the-Samsung-device-has-over-the-Apple-phone-for-just-US-100-more.689957.0.html
Sorry what buffs? All I'm seeing is the 10x optical zoom and faster charging. Apple's don't need as much memory, Android sucks in this regard. I don't regard a slightly larger screen as a buff. This is clutching at straws and no I don't own Apple, Samsung S21 owner.
Apple is stuck in good old stone age who buys that crap these days
Why no 4K@120fps and no oversampled footage. There's no use of 8K if the quality is crap.
They should include full sensor readout 6K or 8K oversampled 4K @ 120fps without pixel binning.
And same for 1080p since most of the videos are uploaded on YouTube is in 1080 resolution. Even samsung livestream their S23 event at 1080p. Can't they record at 8K?
Quote from: Mr Majestyk on February 03, 2023, 02:01:01Sorry what buffs? All I'm seeing is the 10x optical zoom and faster charging. Apple's don't need as much memory, Android sucks in this regard. I don't regard a slightly larger screen as a buff. This is clutching at straws and no I don't own Apple, Samsung S21 owner.
S-Pen is solid, it's far more accurate(at least the phone version) than Ntrig, but yes the other points are generally irrelevant or moot. I especially consider the so-called 200MP a fundamentally misled way of tackling image quality, or maybe that's the point considering peoples' attention just isn't where it should be, and that's on the PRODUCT.