The AMD Radeon RX 7700S scored 81,145 points on Geekbench's OpenCL benchmark, performing more or less on par with the Radeon RX 6700M and about 28% faster than the RDNA 2-based Radeon RX 6700S. Unfortunately, it cannot take on the better-specced GeForce RTX 4060. https://www.notebookcheck.net/AMD-Radeon-RX-7700S-falls-short-of-the-last-gen-GeForce-RTX-3060-in-Geekbench-s-OpenCL-benchmark.679717.0.html
QuoteGeekbench isn't exactly the best graphics card benchmark out there, so it's best to reserve judgment until more benchmark data shows up.
Explain the title in the article then.
Alternate take: Latest gen 7700S (a low energy variant chip) is 28% faster than a previous gen full power chip (6700M). I'm sure the 7700S will have substantially higher performance per watt as well compared to the 3060. GPUs are already so good on the mobile displays they power, efficiency is more important now than just raw power.
Comparing an Ultrabook class AMD GPU with a gaming laptop Nvidia GPU... Sigh, ofcourse the Nvidia is faster, it's meant to be because it an entirely different power envelop and bigger cooling equipment, it's a different class.
What a bad title, what a bad comparison, you will miss-inform ppl this way, such a shame for a quality website like this...
Click bait at its worse.
Stop with the clickbait. This Low-power laptop GPU does not in any way "fall short" and the 4060's true competitor, the 7600M XT, is simply better at a lower price. Remember, the 4060 is only about 10% faster than the 3060