The third generation of Sony's flagship smartphone is also supposed to convince mainly with features for professional photographers. But the Sony-typical design and the high-resolution screen could also make it attractive for other users.
https://www.notebookcheck.net/Sony-Xperia-1-III-smartphone-review-Camera-phone-with-variable-telephoto-focal-length.552075.0.html
interesting, although in the camera dpt xperia, acc to the text, seems to be at least on par with the competitors, the final verdict shows the worst mark of all four. care to explain? not to mention the fact the photo quality estimations, for ALL phones, are based strictly on the eye perception of the reviewer, no objective quantification at all. very far from the last week promise of a thorough analysis....
If you want to see how well optimised Sony phones are you only need to look at the Xperia 1 ii Geekbench scores, basically their s865 is only a neck behind the Xiaomi 11 pro with s888.
Quote from: mixedfish on July 23, 2021, 19:08:28
If you want to see how well optimised Sony phones are you only need to look at the Xperia 1 ii Geekbench scores, basically their s865 is only a neck behind the Xiaomi 11 pro with s888.
Sir, you are utterly wrong.
Mi 11 Pro Geekbench - 1137 for 1core, 3785 for all cores.
Sony Xperia 1 II Geekbench - 808 for 1core, 2777 for all cores
That's almost 50% difference in comparison.
มันมีดีขึ้นตามลำดับไม่เหมือนใครๆให้ภาพชัดเจนสมจริงน่าทึ่ง เสียงที่เพราะๆความละเอียดสูงไม่มีตกสุดยอดมาก
ติแค่ใช้แบตหมดเร็ว ให้แบตน้อยน่าจะ5000Amขึ้น ราคาแพงไป
So we have here the first Sony phone with dual frequency GPS, yet there is no test of it in this review. What happened NotebookCheck, did you have your bikes stolen or you just got lazy ?
I wonder why the microSD card reader benchmark section is missing in this review. Can you test the microSD card reader of the Sony Xperia 1 III? Last year's Xperia 1 II had a slow card reader, according to your benchmark :
︿
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard 34.7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard 30.7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
﹀
Which is half the performance of the 2018 Galaxy S9! However, the 256GB internal storage is usually enough for most people.
AndroBench test results for my Samsung Galaxy S9 + 512GB Samsung EVO Select microSD card :
︿
Date : 2020-10-19 01:51:07
Microbenchmark
Target: /storage/2408-55D3 (sdcardfs, -)
64MB / 32768KB / 4KB / 8
SEQUENTIAL READ: 78.66 MB/s
SEQUENTIAL WRITE: 48.77 MB/s
RANDOM READ: 1868.78 IOPS
RANDOM WRITE: 567.8 IOPS
SQLite benchmark
1 / WAL / Index
SQLite Insert: 1160.99 QPS
SQLite Update: 2282.22 QPS
SQLite Delete: 1957.02 QPS
﹀
Sometimes I even get 81.69 MB/s Sequential Read and 49.94 MB/s Sequential Write.
Quote from: skoda9635 on July 24, 2021, 11:10:57
Sir, you are utterly wrong.
Mi 11 Pro Geekbench - 1137 for 1core, 3785 for all cores.
Sony Xperia 1 II Geekbench - 808 for 1core, 2777 for all cores
That's almost 50% difference in comparison.
Not really, did you read this review?
Geekbench 5.2
Xperia 1 ii 898
Mi 11 Ultra 989
If this review is wrong go report.