NotebookCHECK - Notebook Forum

English => News => Topic started by: Redaktion on April 30, 2020, 13:47:49

Title: Intel Core i9-10900K hands out huge Time Spy CPU Score but gets unsurprisingly left far behind by AMD Ryzen 9 3950X in Cinebench R15 multi-core comparison
Post by: Redaktion on April 30, 2020, 13:47:49
Intel's new Comet Lake Core i9-10900K has been spotted in a couple of benchmarks. The 10-core desktop processor performed incredibly well in 3DMark's Time Spy where it produced a high CPU score. However, the i9-10900K fared much worse in a Cinebench R15 multi-core comparison, lagging far behind a 16-core AMD Ryzen 9 3950X chip.

https://www.notebookcheck.net/Intel-Core-i9-10900K-hands-out-huge-Time-Spy-CPU-Score-but-gets-unsurprisingly-left-far-behind-by-AMD-Ryzen-9-3950X-in-Cinebench-R15-multi-core-comparison.463332.0.html
Title: Re: Intel Core i9-10900K hands out huge Time Spy CPU Score but gets unsurprisingly left far behind b
Post by: Dewayne Thomas on April 30, 2020, 15:53:00
Yeah, let's make it a fair comparison. Ryzen 9 3900X comes in at 430 dollars, comes with a fan, uses far less watts, and still competes in the single thread, and still crushes in multicore. Oh, and you can throw it into a 50 dollar motherboard and still get those results. Yuh know, just to keep it fair. I can't wait for Ryzen 4000.
Title: Re: Intel Core i9-10900K hands out huge Time Spy CPU Score but gets unsurprisingly left far behind b
Post by: flop on April 30, 2020, 17:42:22
The Ryzen 9 has been available for a long time now. Next gen Zen is already around the corner.
Title: Re: Intel Core i9-10900K hands out huge Time Spy CPU Score but gets unsurprisingly left far behind b
Post by: _MT_ on April 30, 2020, 17:46:13
Quote from: Daniel R Deakin
Considering the differences between the two Intel parts, you would expect a much greater improvement from the Intel Core i9-10900K chip anyway, but this new result is still outstanding.
You would what? They added two cores (10 vs. 8), that's +25 %. And the boost went up by 6 % I believe (5.3 vs 5 GHz). If you combine it, it gives you 32.5 %. Not that it makes much sense as it's single core boost, not all core boost. All core boost went up by 2 % (4.8 vs 4.7 I believe) which would give you just under 28 %. And it scored 46 % higher. One of us has funky math. The R15 multi-core difference Asus presents is pretty close to that at just under 31 %.
Title: Re: Intel Core i9-10900K hands out huge Time Spy CPU Score but gets unsurprisingly left far behind b
Post by: dasllkdsakdas on April 30, 2020, 22:03:08
Quote from: flop on April 30, 2020, 17:42:22
The Ryzen 9 has been available for a long time now. Next gen Zen is already around the corner.
Yeah, the corner is end of this year. Just around the corner...
Title: Re: Intel Core i9-10900K hands out huge Time Spy CPU Score but gets unsurprisingly left far behind b
Post by: Martin RapavĂ˝ on May 01, 2020, 01:19:53
It is actually already here, just not the desktop parts yet.

But check out the mobile parts to get a peek at what to expect in the autumn.

Title: Re: Intel Core i9-10900K hands out huge Time Spy CPU Score but gets unsurprisingly left far behind b
Post by: RinzImpulse on May 01, 2020, 05:24:47
Quote from: Martin RapavĂ˝ on May 01, 2020, 01:19:53
It is actually already here, just not the desktop parts yet.

But check out the mobile parts to get a peek at what to expect in the autumn.


No. Mobile APU is using Zen 2 and mobile APU is pretty much different when compared to desktop as they're tunned to be power efficient
Title: Re: Intel Core i9-10900K hands out huge Time Spy CPU Score but gets unsurprisingly left far behind b
Post by: Alex544 on May 02, 2020, 01:44:49
Quote from: Dewayne Thomas on April 30, 2020, 15:53:00
Yeah, let's make it a fair comparison. Ryzen 9 3900X comes in at 430 dollars, comes with a fan, uses far less watts, and still competes in the single thread, and still crushes in multicore. Oh, and you can throw it into a 50 dollar motherboard and still get those results. Yuh know, just to keep it fair. I can't wait for Ryzen 4000.
Too bad the 3900x still loses to the 8700k in gaming
And please don't pair the 3900X with a $50 motherboard lmao
Title: Re: Intel Core i9-10900K hands out huge Time Spy CPU Score but gets unsurprisingly left far behind b
Post by: Quan on May 03, 2020, 10:46:18
Quote from: Dewayne Thomas on April 30, 2020, 15:53:00
Yeah, let's make it a fair comparison. Ryzen 9 3900X comes in at 430 dollars, comes with a fan, uses far less watts, and still competes in the single thread, and still crushes in multicore. Oh, and you can throw it into a 50 dollar motherboard and still get those results. Yuh know, just to keep it fair. I can't wait for Ryzen 4000.
Don't be an idiot, the Ryzen9 3900X certainly isn't 430USD normally and you wouldn't throw in a 50usd mobo lmao