Text only | Text with Images

NotebookCHECK - Notebook Forum

English => News => Topic started by: Redaktion on June 30, 2026, 19:32:18

Title: Steam Machine performance benchmark shows 20% loss without dual-channel memory spec
Post by: Redaktion on June 30, 2026, 19:32:18
Despite its lofty price, Steam Machine performance is not as optimized as expected. To address high DDR5 RAM costs, Valve installed one 16 GB module. New benchmarks confirm that lacking dual-channel memory, apps and games produce significantly lower scores and frame rates.

https://www.notebookcheck.net/Steam-Machine-performance-benchmark-shows-20-loss-without-dual-channel-memory-spec.1331990.0.html
Title: Re: Steam Machine performance benchmark shows 20% loss without dual-channel memory spec
Post by: nosey on June 30, 2026, 21:48:12
Why is single channel RAM cheaper? I thought the most expensive part of RAM is fast, high-density chips.
Title: Re: Steam Machine performance benchmark shows 20% loss without dual-channel memory spec
Post by: Reserved on July 01, 2026, 05:11:05
It is.

The main reason for it as stated in previous Valve interviews was due to lack of component supply not pricing so much.
Title: Re: Steam Machine performance benchmark shows 20% loss without dual-channel memory spec
Post by: But only 8 GB of VRAM on July 01, 2026, 21:11:13
Adding the 2nd RAM stick and enabling dual-channel will not fix its only 8 GB of VRAM, as the GPU part is not upgradable. Just get a PC and install SteamOS. One might call the 8 GB of VRAM VALVE's strategic mistake (look, even the big reviewers on YouTube complain about the only 8 GB of VRAM and they have millions). The 8 GB of VRAM issue started like 4-5 years ago.
Here is a more recent one about only 8 GB of VRAM: youtube.com/watch?v=ric7yb1vaoa ("gaming laptops are in trouble - vram testing w/ ‪@hardwareunboxed‬").
Indeed, the recent memory price increase doesn't help this issue.
Text only | Text with Images