Some honest feedback: it's hard to understand what this article is arguing for.
The user felt it was too bright indoors -> suggest it's not needed or that brighter panels are a tradeoff (of what exactly?).
The conclusion drawn from the premise doesn't make sense as is. A much better approach would be to discuss the issue actually faced, which is that the "auto brightness level" feature needs tuning in the wake of newer panels.
There is no trade off to be made since it gives better outdoor visibility.
I much prefer a good anti-reflective screen than always higher levels of brightness.
TCL does it great on their smartphones and tablets.
Apparently 3.5 nits is considered "too bright" now?