In the fragment "17 GB of memory" consider changing "memory" to "storage" for consistency with how Samsung specifies the various models.
It's a permanent security risk. It's also a shady practice, where they on a 256 GB model just short changed you 17 / 256 = 7% on storage. It may force a customer into the model with storage than they otherwise need. For context, there is is currently $200 difference on in price between the S26 Ultra 256 GB and the S26 Ultra 512 GB.
I really hope someone successfully sues Samsung over this, and that customers looks elsewhere for a flagship phone.
QuoteSamsung Galaxy S26 Ultra receives criticism for tons of bloatware
I mean, they have to justify the insane price
somehow, right?
Quote from: Allan Wind on March 09, 2026, 17:55:03It's a permanent security risk.
It's not. Almost all third-party apps listed in the article can be uninstalled, the rest can be disabled. This takes a few seconds.