Print Page - It’s time to kill slow fingerprint scanners on all phones over $300

Title: It’s time to kill slow fingerprint scanners on all phones over $300
Post by: Redaktion on February 24, 2026, 19:41:39

If you hate the fingerprinting scanner on your Android phones, you are not alone. Optical in-display fingerprint scanners on many $300+ Android phones remain slow and unreliable in 2026, often failing with wet fingers - even on phones from market leaders.

https://www.notebookcheck.net/It-s-time-to-kill-slow-fingerprint-scanners-on-all-phones-over-300.1233674.0.html

Title: Re: It’s time to kill slow fingerprint scanners on all phones over $300
Post by: The Werewolf on February 24, 2026, 23:40:41

0th world problem if I ever heard one, given that the average new cellphone price world-wide is $350.
Also, why even set a limit? "If you're too poor to own an expensive cellphone, then suffer with garbage phones!"
The price difference isn't parts anymore, it's markup. ALL new cellphones should have reliable biometrics, not just the expensive ones.

Title: Re: It’s time to kill slow fingerprint scanners on all phones over $300
Post by: Worgarthe on February 25, 2026, 08:59:35

Quote from: Redaktion on February 24, 2026, 19:41:39Optical in-display fingerprint scanners on many $300+ Android phones remain slow and unreliable in 2026

Nhf but I stopped reading right here because this is incorrect (to generalise as broadly as you did, at least). My phone (Nothing (3a)) unlocks as soon as I touch it even on a quick tap, faster than I can react. There is no perceivable delay when compared to my friend's iPhone 16 Pro and do I care if the 16 Pro unlock 2 ms faster (while both under 30 ms and no it is not faster because you have to look at it)? Absolutely not. It's as fast as both of my ThinkPads with their physical scanners - instant.

NotebookCHECK - Notebook Forum

English => Miscellaneous => Topic started by: Redaktion on February 24, 2026, 19:41:39