Nice article. Do you have any data points for Strix Halo at lower power? Based on the video from Digital Foundry on the GPD Win 5 it scales well down to comparable power settings, likely with higher efficiency.
Although the Strix Halo GPUs are even faster (but not more efficient), they operate at higher power limits. There are only a handful of corresponding devices on the market, which then are also quite expensive.
Basless comment as you did not compare the two at the same power levels. The fact that 8060s @ 80W was more efficient than Panther Lake at its default power level tells me that 8060S compared at 20/28/35/45W would be very efficient too.
Intel has just delivered +70% iGPU perf and efficiency out of thin air in a genuine thin and light form factor. Meanwhile, AMD fanboys are upset; the latest rumors say we'll be stuck with RDNA 3.5 until 2029! I'd be mad too!
Quote from: br83taylor on Today at 03:25:57Do you have any data points for Strix Halo at lower power?
ThePhawx does. It does scale but only to a certain point. Halo does better at the higher power tiers while at the lower end panther lake does better.
Quote from: Terror Byte on Today at 03:45:00The fact that 8060s @ 80W was more efficient than Panther Lake
Who uses or cares about performance at 80W? NUC users?
Quote from: opckieran on Today at 06:23:36Meanwhile, AMD fanboys are upset; the latest rumors say we'll be stuck with RDNA 3.5 until 2029! I'd be mad too!
Currently going through the 5 stages of grief. Almost at the end now. I've just come to accept it.
From now on I will no longer comment on AMD gfx IP unless it's PlayStation or Exynos news. Not until after 2029, if their Radeon division hasn't been sold off to Sony by then.