Wait, so the Radeon 8060S in the Strix Halo APU is 5.66 times, or 466 %, faster, but a Strix Halo PC costs "only" about 2 times more (and have more and faster RAM due to Strix Halo being quad-channel (4*64-bit = 256-bit APU))? But note tho: The Radeon 8060S is about as fast as a 4060 Laptop[1] and if you'd build a desktop PC with a 4060[2], the desktop PC would be much cheaper.
[1]
According to 3dmark.com/search:
- 8060S: "Average score: 10013"
- 4060 (notebook): "Average score: 10511"
- 4070 (notebook): "Average score: 12537"
[2] Don't, get a 16 GB VRAM GPU: youtube.com/watch?v=ric7yb1VaoA "Gaming Laptops are in Trouble - VRAM Testing w/ ‪@Hardwareunboxed‬"
I don't know why nbc doesn't do the consumer a favour and just state in every article that the fast memory of kits like the 395+ provide a compelling advantage. AIDA (memory copy speed), "NPU" (the AMD has none but is still much faster than the NPU enabled ms-02), power usage anything with a 395+ is much better than this kit with its slow, slow RAM.