NotebookCHECK - Notebook Forum

English => News => Topic started by: Redaktion on December 16, 2025, 15:08:25

Title: Core Ultra 7 365 performance leaks: Intel Panther Lake CPU is reportedly 10% slower vs Core Ultra 7 258V
Post by: Redaktion on December 16, 2025, 15:08:25
The Core Ultra 7 365, an 8-core Intel Panther Lake CPU, has leaked on Geekbench, giving us our first look at the potential performance of the chip. Sadly, based on the Geekbench 6.3 single and multi-core results, the Core Ultra 7 365's performance is nothing to write home about.

https://www.notebookcheck.net/Core-Ultra-7-365-performance-leaks-Intel-Panther-Lake-CPU-is-reportedly-10-slower-vs-Core-Ultra-7-258V.1187138.0.html
Title: Re: Core Ultra 7 365 performance leaks: Intel Panther Lake CPU is reportedly 10% slower vs Core Ultr
Post by: Bizarro_NikoB on December 16, 2025, 15:57:12
And wasn't the 2xx series slower than the 1xx series because they focused on efficiency, or am I remembering it wrong?
Title: Re: Core Ultra 7 365 performance leaks: Intel Panther Lake CPU is reportedly 10% slower vs Core Ultr
Post by: Yielar on December 16, 2025, 19:22:01
Panther Lake won't be slower than Arrow Lake. You guys are so eager to pump out an article you'll post anything these days.
Title: Re: Core Ultra 7 365 performance leaks: Intel Panther Lake CPU is reportedly 10% slower vs Core Ultr
Post by: Yielar on December 16, 2025, 19:24:56
Quote from: Bizarro_NikoB on Yesterday at 15:57:12And wasn't the 2xx series slower than the 1xx series because they focused on efficiency, or am I remembering it wrong?

No, Arrow Lake configurations scale to many more cores (up to 24 cores on some parts), giving them a clear advantage in sustained, multi-threaded tasks such as rendering, compiling, and heavier gaming workloads.� Lunar Lake typically has far fewer cores and lower power budgets, so in heavy, fully loaded scenarios Arrow Lake is the higher performer.
Title: Re: Core Ultra 7 365 performance leaks: Intel Panther Lake CPU is reportedly 10% slower vs Core Ultr
Post by: Hal900 on December 17, 2025, 00:50:13
Quote from: Yielar on Yesterday at 19:22:01Panther Lake won't be slower than Arrow Lake. You guys are so eager to pump out an article you'll post anything these days.
realistically it may be because of 18A
Title: Re: Core Ultra 7 365 performance leaks: Intel Panther Lake CPU is reportedly 10% slower vs Core Ultr
Post by: Hal900 on December 17, 2025, 00:56:42
Maybe not here, but on 16 cores with an open power limit, something like 90 watts, Panther Lake should be 15% faster than Arrow Lake H, thanks to the LPE modules
Title: Re: Core Ultra 7 365 performance leaks: Intel Panther Lake CPU is reportedly 10% slower vs Core Ultr
Post by: Terror Byte on December 17, 2025, 00:59:37
Quote from: Hal900 on Today at 00:50:13
Quote from: Yielar on Yesterday at 19:22:01Panther Lake won't be slower than Arrow Lake. You guys are so eager to pump out an article you'll post anything these days.
realistically it may be because of 18A

Yet the other day the Ultra 9 388 was faster than Halo 395+ and AL 285H, now we expect it to be slower than AL H. These guys will print any nonsense they can latch on to for clicks.
Title: Re: Core Ultra 7 365 performance leaks: Intel Panther Lake CPU is reportedly 10% slower vs Core Ultr
Post by: Hal900 on December 17, 2025, 01:05:50
Quote from: Terror Byte on Today at 00:59:37
Quote from: Hal900 on Today at 00:50:13
Quote from: Yielar on Yesterday at 19:22:01Panther Lake won't be slower than Arrow Lake. You guys are so eager to pump out an article you'll post anything these days.
realistically it may be because of 18A

Yet the other day the Ultra 9 388 was faster than Halo 395+ and AL 285H, now we expect it to be slower than AL H. These guys will print any nonsense they can latch on to for clicks.

For a month now, it's been clear that 18A is worse than N3B. Panther Lake is better, but not everyone will see it. They haven't really changed anything in the CPU except the LPE module. It has lower clock speeds and that's it.