NotebookCHECK - Notebook Forum

English => News => Topic started by: Redaktion on December 03, 2025, 15:11:00

Title: Intel Core Ultra 7 366H surfaces in early benchmark with AMD Radeon 840M rivalling iGPU performance
Post by: Redaktion on December 03, 2025, 15:11:00
Intel Panther Lake processors will soon be available across a range of laptop classes. In the meantime, the prospective performance of a new Arc Xe3 iGPU has surfaced in the Core Ultra 7 366H, with less-than-stellar results.

https://www.notebookcheck.net/Intel-Core-Ultra-7-366H-surfaces-in-early-benchmark-with-AMD-Radeon-840M-rivalling-iGPU-performance.1176587.0.html
Title: Re: Intel Core Ultra 7 366H surfaces in early benchmark with AMD Radeon 840M rivalling iGPU performa
Post by: TyPO: 366H on December 03, 2025, 16:32:41
"Currently, the Core Ultra 7 336H has only appeared in the Dell Pro Precision 7 16..."
Title: Re: Intel Core Ultra 7 366H surfaces in early benchmark with AMD Radeon 840M rivalling iGPU performa
Post by: Fred on December 03, 2025, 16:36:11
Is it me or... is it really under-performing?
Title: Re: Intel Core Ultra 7 366H surfaces in early benchmark with AMD Radeon 840M rivalling iGPU performa
Post by: Hotz on December 03, 2025, 17:47:07
According to wccftech it has supposedly 4 Xe3-cores, which would make sense.

About the "underperforming" ...  it is what it has always been:

- There seems to be a 15-20% improvement compared to Xe1 graphics
- There seems to be no improvement compared to Xe2 graphics: the reason is that Xe2 was only available with on-chip-memory and thus had a speed advantage. Meanwhile they removed on-chip-memory again, and as a consequence they are a slower than Xe2 again.

Please note, that there never was a +50% improvement claimed in countless magazines, at least not on a core-to-core basis. The +50% improvement was based on that they added +50% more Xe-cores to Panther Lake (12 Xe-cores) compared to Meteor/Arrow Lake (8 Xe-cores), and then made the claim of +50% more performance. The trick was obvious and cheap - and yet ignored by most "Tech-Websites".

There still seems to be an improvement, as guesstimated above, but not thaaaaaat much ...