NotebookCHECK - Notebook Forum

English => News => Topic started by: Redaktion on July 06, 2025, 14:06:28

Title: Exynos 2500 trades blows with the Snapdragon 8 Elite in GPU benchmark but lags behind in CPU performance
Post by: Redaktion on July 06, 2025, 14:06:28
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 has now made several trips to Geekbench ahead of its official debut at Unpacked. The foldable impresses in the OpenCL test but only performs as well as the last-gen Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 on the CPU side.

https://www.notebookcheck.net/Exynos-2500-trades-blows-with-the-Snapdragon-8-Elite-in-GPU-benchmark-but-lags-behind-in-CPU-performance.1052463.0.html
Title: Re: Exynos 2500 trades blows with the Snapdragon 8 Elite in GPU benchmark but lags behind in CPU per
Post by: Ram on July 06, 2025, 19:19:41
So, bottom line, Samsung 3nm GAAFET can finally match TSMC 4nm, while costing more?

I think the issue is going to be how much it costs compared to TSMC processes, and how much reliable are their yield rates.

Title: Re: Exynos 2500 trades blows with the Snapdragon 8 Elite in GPU benchmark but lags behind in CPU per
Post by: K 0 on July 06, 2025, 20:32:42
Gpu performance seems very good ,well above my expectation . I will looking forward to Exynos 2600 now. CPU side is very interesting. It has x925 but has much less IPC than dimensty 9400's x925. I expected around 2500 single core since it has 3.3ghz , lower than 3.6 GHz on dimensty 9400.
Title: Re: Exynos 2500 trades blows with the Snapdragon 8 Elite in GPU benchmark but lags behind in CPU per
Post by: Morsel on July 09, 2025, 18:32:16
Quote from: K 0 on July 06, 2025, 20:32:42Gpu performance seems very good ,well above my expectation . I will looking forward to Exynos 2600 now. CPU side is very interesting. It has x925 but has much less IPC than dimensty 9400's x925. I expected around 2500 single core since it has 3.3ghz , lower than 3.6 GHz on dimensty 9400.
What is IPC in   your definition?
Title: Re: Exynos 2500 trades blows with the Snapdragon 8 Elite in GPU benchmark but lags behind in CPU per
Post by: LOL on July 11, 2025, 08:03:43
Samsung is keeping Exynos alive to keep the Korean unions happy, that's all.

AMD collaboration will not save Exynos.

If Samsung wants a cheaper option without paying the Qualcomm tax, it can use one of the newer Mediatek Dimensity chips, which are superior than anything Exynos.

Let's put it another way: if Exynos chips were that good (performance, value for money), it would be found in some other non-Samsung phones. The fact that this didn't happen, tells you everything you need to know.
Title: Re: Exynos 2500 trades blows with the Snapdragon 8 Elite in GPU benchmark but lags behind in CPU per
Post by: Behave on July 11, 2025, 11:49:12
Quote from: LOL on July 11, 2025, 08:03:43Samsung is keeping Exynos alive to keep the Korean unions happy, that's all.

I honestly don't think Samsung need to worry about keeping anyone happy in Korea. They literally are Korea and own everything there.

Quote from: LOL on July 11, 2025, 08:03:43AMD collaboration will not save Exynos.

Because AMD has a history of doing doing sucky collabs. They all just fail most of the time, even most of the games they sponsor aren't good.

Quote from: LOL on July 11, 2025, 08:03:43newer Mediatek Dimensity chips, which are superior

I keep hearing this argument. So where are the custom roms for all modern dimensity socs? Go to custom ROM land and it's literally crickets in terms of support. If mediatek wish to be taken seriously they need to actually support and take them seriously.

Quote from: LOL on July 11, 2025, 08:03:43it would be found in some other non-Samsung phones.

But it is? It's called Pixel. Literally the Tensor G series 1-4.

Can you even find any phones with mediatek with long term 7 years of OS update support? I know you can with Snapdragon/Exynos but I am unsure about mediatek if there are any..
Title: Re: Exynos 2500 trades blows with the Snapdragon 8 Elite in GPU benchmark but lags behind in CPU per
Post by: Joe on July 13, 2025, 23:16:31
Quote from: Ram on July 06, 2025, 19:19:41So, bottom line, Samsung 3nm GAAFET can finally match TSMC 4nm, while costing more?

I think the issue is going to be how much it costs compared to TSMC processes, and how much reliable are their yield rates.



Lol, Samsung 3nm is better than TSMC 4nm.
Last year 8G3 in the Flip6 scores ~2000/6200 in GB6 vs ~2300/8000 for the Flip7. Big difference.