In a video posted by Mrwhosetheboss on YouTube, he tested four AI models from different brands and scored them based on performance in each task. Mrwhosetheboss went from simple queries to tricky questions and research, pushing each model to its limit.https://www.notebookcheck.net/AI-battle-Grok-surprises-Mrwhosetheboss-with-its-performance-and-ChatGPT-wins.1050815.0.html
Yeah, I've learned very quickly that all of these Ai bots are very biased and verbatim.
All one has to do to test these Ai's answers is to... know a known fact, right, then, ask the Ai a question on that known fact that you know is true, 99% of the time, the Ai will scrap something from a online outlet (that we could've done), and/or, show that it has a heavy leaning biased answers without no proof to its answers, just hearsay... on & on!
Ai should only be used at entertainment, not as a source for 100% accurate results.
Quote from: TruthIsThere on July 04, 2025, 11:45:43Ai should only be used at entertainment, not as a source for 100% accurate results.
1) This is so for LLMs.
2) There are math theorem inventing / proof AIs, which can be 100% trusted after proofreading as human verification of already established correctness.
3) There are specialised empirical AIs (e.g., deep learning) that can be used not only for entertainment but can be used seriously with care and good interpretation.