You have to measure from the thickest part of the phone, not the thinnest. Otherwise they'll just start sharpening the phones to a knife's blade. We figured this out like a decade ago when people started interesting their wrists on MacBooks, remember?
When you actually measure the true thickness of the phone, this phone is fat AF. The thickness of the camera... Which is still thinner than the true thickness of the phone once it's in its mandatory case.
Not that it matters though, everybody realized that buying the thinnest phone is dumb, right around when we had to choke down our first $200 pair of Air pods to replace our much, much nicer wired headphones.
QuoteAt just 163 grams, the 6.7-inch device feels extremely light, almost making comparison devices, all of which weigh over 210 grams, seem like heavyweights.
Snapdragon 8 Elite + 6.7 inch and only 163g is something new and I personally am in the market for something with these specs and light-weighty. Can confirm, my old S4 Mini - 160g - was very nicely lightweight. Would be awesome if the mid-range, like the A56, would offer something e.g. a A56L (or the successor A57L) (L for lightweight, or A56F (F for featherweight)). So let's go SAMSUNG and others: To sell more phones here is a good reason: Lightweight models (I'm not being sarcastic, I loved the lightfulness of my old phone).
I am beginning to doubt notebookcheck battery tests. Something is fishy here. They seem to go counter to most other tests one can find online.
Camera modules stands out almost the width of the device: other than horrible i can't consider this device as "slim" without laughing.