I think I am the opposite market here... I wait until games are 4+years old, cost $10 or less, and have patches that make the game playable.
Too many games to screw with alpha/beta software.
Good. This is needed for sure I can think of one publisher/developer who's entire portfolio is literally this.
Looking at you Snail games & Wildcard..
Quote from: What's in a name on February 09, 2025, 22:36:01Good. This is needed for sure I can think of one publisher/developer who's entire portfolio is literally this.
Looking at you Snail games & Wildcard..
I was just thinking the same thing when I was reading the article.
Good to know I wasn't the only one.
Good.
Too many vaporware projects out there.
Deve should have some semblance of a plan
Steam should just remove all early access that does not receive updates for 3 months. Not only that is that a security risk but also it's very lame programmers too. Like wrf
Quote from: Nobe on February 10, 2025, 22:03:48Steam should just remove all early access that does not receive updates for 3 months. Not only that is that a security risk but also it's very lame programmers too. Like wrf
^^^ This ^^^
Plus refund anyone that purchased the 'abandonware' in the first place. :)
Don't get me wrong, I like the IDEA of 'early access' and providing feedback to developers so that hopefully they can create better games (ala paying to be an alpha tester) however the expectation ALWAYS is that the developer actually RELEASES a game!!!