NotebookCHECK - Notebook Forum

English => News => Topic started by: Redaktion on December 02, 2024, 16:00:35

Title: Intel CEO Pat Gelsinger announces abrupt retirement
Post by: Redaktion on December 02, 2024, 16:00:35
Pat Gelsinger, who got Intel out of the Rocket Lake rut, has announced his resignation as the company's CEO. He hasn't announced an immediate successor, and the company will be led in the interim by David Zinsner and Michelle (MJ) Johnston Holthaus.

https://www.notebookcheck.net/Intel-CEO-Pat-Gelsinger-announces-abrupt-retirement.926904.0.html
Title: Re: Intel CEO Pat Gelsinger announces abrupt retirement
Post by: Hunter2020 on December 02, 2024, 16:43:11
Boohoo.  In the future I never want to touch Intel/AMD again.  My most recent and LAST Intel machine was/IS a 11th gen.  In a few years China will release much superior products to compete with Intel/AMD.  Not that China already doesn't already have them BUT they're currently not very cost effective nor powerful.

Not to mention the accompanying OS.  I wouldn't have stuck around with Intel for so long were it not for Windows...
Title: Re: Intel CEO Pat Gelsinger announces abrupt retirement
Post by: RobertJasiek on December 02, 2024, 16:55:49
Quote from: Hunter2020 on December 02, 2024, 16:43:11In the future I never want to touch Intel/AMD again.

Curious: what will you buy instead?
Title: Re: Intel CEO Pat Gelsinger announces abrupt retirement
Post by: TruthIsThere on December 02, 2024, 17:25:20
A year, and many consumers highly-concerned feedback ignored, too late.

The huge difference in an AMD failure vs an Intel failure is, Intel, arrogance rules Intel, while just incompetence is seared into AMD.
Title: Re: Intel CEO Pat Gelsinger announces abrupt retirement
Post by: RobertJasiek on December 02, 2024, 17:41:55
Quote from: TruthIsThere on December 02, 2024, 17:25:20A year, and many consumers highly-concerned feedback ignored, too late.

Only concerning the last 12 months, consumers have mentioned
- still too high consumption of chips other than Lunar Lake,
- happy with Lunar Lake for its efficiency at low consumption but too few OEMs get their devices right,
- unhappy with Lunar Lake at medium to high consumption because AMD is faster or more efficient there,
- prices do not reflect subpar features of the chips.

I think that earlier disappointments related to security gaps and 13th/14th gen arrogance towards consumers weigh higher. Not to mention the +++++++ years. What other concerns do you think consumers have?