NotebookCHECK - Notebook Forum

English => News => Topic started by: Redaktion on August 13, 2024, 21:07:57

Title: New genetically modified poplar trees no longer need pre-engineering processing
Post by: Redaktion on August 13, 2024, 21:07:57
Although genetically modified wood has been around for a while, the latest poplar trees that were tweaked by a team of researchers with the University of Maryland are taking it all to the next level. Their genetically modified poplar trees deliver high-quality structural wood that can be engineered without the use of chemicals.

https://www.notebookcheck.net/New-genetically-modified-poplar-trees-no-longer-need-pre-engineering-processing.875083.0.html
Title: Re: New genetically modified poplar trees no longer need pre-engineering processing
Post by: Automatic for the Sheeple on August 14, 2024, 02:11:17
"our fight against climate change" how about a fight against globalists agenda? Climate change circus being one of their vectors along with vaccines, genetically modified foods, fluoride poison in drinking water, trans-gender/trans-humanism shoved down the public's throat, etc. Who asked for these GMO trees? Who exactly benefits from it?
Title: Re: New genetically modified poplar trees no longer need pre-engineering processing
Post by: Steve Nordquist on August 15, 2024, 13:56:08
Quote from: Automatic for the Sheeple on August 14, 2024, 02:11:17"our fight against climate change" how about a fight against globalists agenda? Climate change circus being one of their vectors along with vaccines, genetically modified foods, fluoride poison in drinking water, trans-gender/trans-humanism shoved down the public's throat, etc. Who asked for these GMO trees? Who exactly benefits from it?

You're provincial, you suck at objectivity, and the benefactors would be wood enthusiasts, licensees, and their customers.
Title: Re: New genetically modified poplar trees no longer need pre-engineering processing
Post by: Hotz on August 15, 2024, 18:42:00
Quote from: Steve Nordquist on August 15, 2024, 13:56:08you suck at objectivity

No, he's right. You are the ignorant one.