NotebookCHECK - Notebook Forum

English => News => Topic started by: Redaktion on May 22, 2024, 04:22:00

Title: Blackmagic lowers the price of its Cinema Camera 6K with a full-frame sensor and 1,500 nits display by over $1,000
Post by: Redaktion on May 22, 2024, 04:22:00
Blackmagic Design has reduced the list price of the Cinema Camera 6K by more than a third, making the camera with a full-frame HDR sensor, Leica L bayonet and 1,500 nits bright touchscreen more affordable than ever before.

https://www.notebookcheck.net/Blackmagic-lowers-the-price-of-its-Cinema-Camera-6K-with-a-full-frame-sensor-and-1-500-nits-display-by-over-1-000.840111.0.html
Title: Re: Blackmagic lowers the price of its Cinema Camera 6K with a full-frame sensor and 1,500 nits disp
Post by: TruthIsThere on May 22, 2024, 06:34:45
Yeah-yeah!

Buuuuut... when the final *commercial* release product reaches home theater systems (UHDs BluRay, ect.), MANY TIMES, all of this "RAW" stuff final results mean absolutely
nothing for the end-user(s). Why?! Well, because the final results, many of times, will still render out having many compression artifacts; colour-casting, crush, banding and tone-mapping issues that the publishing's house(s) tries to hide by injecting dancing-ants awful film-grain, rough dithering, ect.; due to many variables e.g. low-skilled post-processing editor/so-called engineer, the so-called (untalented) colourist (what?! is that suppose to be a real title/label for something that is extremely subjective by person-2-person 😏) overexposer or too much saturation and/or contrast, ect. SMH!
Title: Re: Blackmagic lowers the price of its Cinema Camera 6K with a full-frame sensor and 1,500 nits disp
Post by: eri on May 22, 2024, 07:08:07
Quote from: TruthIsThere on May 22, 2024, 06:34:45Yeah-yeah!

Buuuuut... when the final *commercial* release product reaches home theater systems (UHDs BluRay, ect.), MANY TIMES, all of this "RAW" stuff final results mean absolutely
nothing for the end-user(s). Why?! Well, because the final results, many of times, will still render out having many compression artifacts; colour-casting, crush, banding and tone-mapping issues that the publishing's house(s) tries to hide by injecting dancing-ants awful film-grain, rough dithering, ect.; due to many variables e.g. low-skilled post-processing editor/so-called engineer, the so-called (untalented) colourist (what?! is that suppose to be a real title/label for something that is extremely subjective by person-2-person 😏) overexposer or too much saturation and/or contrast, ect. SMH!

Its not really so much as for our enjoyment so much as for the producer & collaborator the workflow