A YouTuber ran AnTuTu on the Exynos 2400-powered Galaxy S24 and the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy-powered Galaxy S24. The Qualcomm chip wins, but not by a lot. https://www.notebookcheck.net/Exynos-2400-lags-behind-Snapdragon-8-Gen-3-for-Galaxy-in-initial-AnTuTu-run.794172.0.html
Can you tell us how is the "playing field equal"? It's S24 vs S24 Ultra. Different cooling solutions, even different RAM values? Don't you know nothing about how smartphones and benchmarks work?
good, so exynos is 43 degrees after antutu, while snapdragon is 38 degrees.
that's all we need to know
what a disgrace of a test. those are different phones. you cant conclude one lags behind other with this...
Any heating of the battery above 37C leads to its accelerated degradation. But the rich kids-players have their own quirks. Why should an adult play on a smartphone? Ask yourself this is the key question?
Don't forget that the Exynos is in much smaller s24 with much worse cooling system than the Ultra.
I guess, S24 plus Exynos vs Snapdragon will be a fair battle.
Quote from: AliJan on January 18, 2024, 08:28:24Can you tell us how is the "playing field equal"? It's S24 vs S24 Ultra. Different cooling solutions, even different RAM values? Don't you know nothing about how smartphones and benchmarks work?
That's the only reference we've got now at this point but they could write the post clearer.
It's only fitting and obvious that Samsung exynos 2400 is both weaker and inferior to Qualcomm snapdragon 8 gen 3. Remember the Google pixel phones powered by the Google-samsung partnership custom tensor chip which proved to be lackluster and weaker and inferior to Qualcomm was basically a exynos chip but renamed to tensor.