NotebookCHECK - Notebook Forum

English => Reviews => Topic started by: Redaktion on November 05, 2023, 00:41:22

Title: Apple iPhone 15 Plus review – The iPhone with an extra-large display and powerful battery
Post by: Redaktion on November 05, 2023, 00:41:22
Not only does the iPhone 15 Plus offer a large display, but it also gets the Dynamic Island for the first time this year. In addition, there is a higher resolution main camera, a slightly more powerful battery, more computing power, and USB-C. All that, Apple tops with a slightly lower price than last year.

https://www.notebookcheck.net/Apple-iPhone-15-Plus-review-The-iPhone-with-an-extra-large-display-and-powerful-battery.764945.0.html
Title: Re: Apple iPhone 15 Plus review – The iPhone with an extra-large display and powerful battery
Post by: Adam222222 on November 05, 2023, 06:44:19
Please explain PWM on this phone. It is badly described right now.
Is it 60 or 480? What is going on? How to interpret this?
Title: Re: Apple iPhone 15 Plus review – The iPhone with an extra-large display and powerful battery
Post by: Jorge Riquelme on November 06, 2023, 00:52:44
A 60 Hz display in end-2023 is totally unacceptable.

And Notebookcheck not claiming it as a clear "cons" is also unacceptable.
Title: Re: Apple iPhone 15 Plus review – The iPhone with an extra-large display and powerful battery
Post by: RobertJasiek on November 06, 2023, 06:35:23
Quote from: Jorge Riquelme on November 06, 2023, 00:52:44A 60 Hz display in end-2023 is totally unacceptable.

Choice should be the norm: 60 Hz for battery life - 120 Hz for smoother viewing.
Title: Re: Apple iPhone 15 Plus review – The iPhone with an extra-large display and powerful battery
Post by: Adam Smith on December 12, 2023, 20:00:31
Please check your PWM data in the article once again.
It seems you've mistaken the refresh rate (60Hz) with the PWM (480Hz) in one sentence.
This is a very important information and notebookcheck is widely considered a valid source of PWM rates information.
But here in this aticle the information on PWM is definately misleading.