Text only | Text with Images

NotebookCHECK - Notebook Forum

English => News => Topic started by: Redaktion on February 03, 2023, 00:51:56

Title: Nvidia RTX 6000 with 18,176 CUDA cores and 300 W TDP 15% slower than RTX 4090 in 3DMark Time Spy
Post by: Redaktion on February 03, 2023, 00:51:56
A Redditor posted Time Spy scores from an RTX 6000 workstation GPU. The RTX 6000 sports a near-complete AD102 die with 18,176 CUDA cores and managed scores that are about 15% lower than an average RTX 4090 (after a Windows update) albeit at a lower 300 W TDP with a blower-style cooler.

https://www.notebookcheck.net/Nvidia-RTX-6000-with-18-176-CUDA-cores-and-300-W-TDP-15-slower-than-RTX-4090-in-3DMark-Time-Spy.689737.0.html
Title: Re: Nvidia RTX 6000 with 18,176 CUDA cores and 300 W TDP 15% slower than RTX 4090 in 3DMark Time Spy
Post by: Mr Majestyk on February 03, 2023, 01:58:12
But those qualified drivers for the Quadro are worth $1000 alone.
Title: Re: Nvidia RTX 6000 with 18,176 CUDA cores and 300 W TDP 15% slower than RTX 4090 in 3DMark Time Spy
Post by: RobertJasiek on February 03, 2023, 08:22:13
Quote from: Mr Majestyk on February 03, 2023, 01:58:12But those qualified drivers for the Quadro are worth $1000 alone.

Why? It may be the price Nvidia demands but why do you think it is justified?
Title: Re: Nvidia RTX 6000 with 18,176 CUDA cores and 300 W TDP 15% slower than RTX 4090 in 3DMark Time Spy
Post by: S.Yu on February 03, 2023, 18:52:50
Quote from: RobertJasiek on February 03, 2023, 08:22:13
Quote from: Mr Majestyk on February 03, 2023, 01:58:12But those qualified drivers for the Quadro are worth $1000 alone.

Why? It may be the price Nvidia demands but why do you think it is justified?
They're only worth what people are willing to pay, and obviously professionals have deep pockets.
Text only | Text with Images