An image comparison between the Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra, Galaxy S22 Ultra, and the Google Pixel 7 Pro has emerged with what seems an obvious winner in terms of overall quality. A pumpkin fruit was used as the subject for the comparison, with the Galaxy S23 Ultra able to hold its own against the highly rated Pixel 7 Pro.https://www.notebookcheck.net/Fruitful-Samsung-Galaxy-S23-Ultra-camera-sample-test-leaves-S22-Ultra-and-Pixel-7-Pro-comparison-shots-lacking-some-zest.668195.0.html
It's just a picture of a pumpkin, there's barely any difference
This is a joke comparison. No ISO settings were mentioned and the exposure is definitely different for the three shots especially for the google phone. Useless.
Just curious, was Apple left out of the comparison because it wasn't Android?
This comparison is bogus cuz I actually have a pixel 7 Pro and a pumpkin and I compare your image to the one I just took and I'm telling you that is full of bull how the hell my look way better than this comparison stop making bogus article to get clickbaits.
What people are failing to understand in the comments here is that as reported in the article the newer sensor delivers far more detail than the S22 and Pixel. Ignore the colors, look at the texture of the pumpkin skin, there are whole elements of texture not picked up by either older generation mobile. This is just the massive increase in raw data from the sensor, expect something similar in the Pixel 8 series but it's obvious no other mobile at the time of release of the S23 series will be able to deliver these sorts of results.