I bet it will be just as fast as whatever the RTX 4050 desktop card would perform later on.
QuoteNvidia GeForce RTX 4090 reviews have overwhelmingly concluded that the Ada Lovelace-based graphics card is incredibly power-hungry.
That is false. Incredibly means stretches reality, and there is nothing comparable.
It is much more efficient than a 3090ti and some ATI's
"RTX 4070 (AD106, 40 W TGP)"
Horrible typo. 140 W !
Quote from: LL on October 22, 2022, 21:50:27QuoteNvidia GeForce RTX 4090 reviews have overwhelmingly concluded that the Ada Lovelace-based graphics card is incredibly power-hungry.
That is false. Incredibly means stretches reality, and there is nothing comparable.
It is much more efficient than a 3090ti and some ATI's
Yeah I agree. This statement bothered me as well. The 4090 is extremely power efficient compared to 3000 series. With 220 watts limit, it performs only 20% less than at full 450 watt limit (see de8auer benchmark).
If anything, it shows that it will likely perform very well in laptops.
I just wonder how much TGP and how much sustainable performance would be left on something like the Blade 15. It's unlikely that Razer would skip the flagship mobile cards entirely just because they've gone thin and light.
They might run them at 80W but then maybe a 70 tier card would be appropriate.