Samsung's Galaxy S20 Ultra is kinda like the Plus model, but on steroids. Not only does it offer an even larger display, it also comes with a massively upgraded camera setup as well as a larger battery. Find out in our review whether or not the Exynos SoC is really that much slower, and if whether the price premium is really worth it.
https://www.notebookcheck.net/Samsung-Galaxy-S20-Ultra-Highend-Smartphone-with-a-Stench-of-Imperfection.459444.0.html
"5G without mmWave"
According to the Samsung's Exynos 990 webpage:
"The modem supports blazingly fast download speed of up to 7.35Gbps in mmWave"
::)
The subpixel array doesn't resemble any Pentile anymore, it seems like RGBG at a slight angle?? The fact that the green subpixels actually take up more area in a pixel (if a pixel is what it seems to be) likely suggests that Samsung is finally confident enough about the performance of their blue diodes that they're not enlarging them in an array for efficiency or for degradation compensation.
India also gets the inferior Exynos chip. What's more, India doesn't even get the higher end 16 GB RAM, 512 GB ROM version.
Samsung has got to stop pushing their Exynos chip set to specific regions.
Exynos should be dead. I wanted to buy Ultra straightaway and after the performance parities between SD865 and Exynos, I am hold. Of course, because of the lousy implementation of the Camera array. BlackShark Pro 5G is another option at the half price. I get SD, big screen and 5G. I started to Samy!