NotebookCHECK - Notebook Forum

English => News => Topic started by: Redaktion on August 01, 2019, 11:39:55

Title: Intel Tiger Lake Y processor posts absurd UserBenchmark scores; Core i9-8950HK single-core performance on a 5 W chip?
Post by: Redaktion on August 01, 2019, 11:39:55
A Tiger Lake Y series processor has appeared on UserBenchmark with some incredible benchmark results. The Ice Lake successor is 25% faster than the Ryzen 7 3750H in single and multi-core tasks while being 11% faster than the Core i7-8750H too. Core i9-8950HK level single-core performance from a 5 W chip? Colour us impressed, if not slightly sceptical.

https://www.notebookcheck.net/Intel-Tiger-Lake-Y-processor-posts-absurd-UserBenchmark-scores-Core-i9-8950HK-single-core-performance-on-a-5-W-chip.428410.0.html
Title: Re: Intel Tiger Lake Y processor posts absurd UserBenchmark scores; Core i9-8950HK single-core perfo
Post by: Imglidinhere on August 03, 2019, 06:35:39
Right and consider that Userbench also lists an i3-8350k as 3% faster than the Ryzen 7 2700X because it has an idiotic weighted scoring system:

40% single core
58% quad core
2% multi core (more than quad)

Interesting how that caters more to the lower-thread Intel chips. Factor that in first before posting these articles please.
Title: Re: Intel Tiger Lake Y processor posts absurd UserBenchmark scores; Core i9-8950HK single-core perfo
Post by: Alex Alderson on August 20, 2019, 11:56:13
Quote from: Imglidinhere on August 03, 2019, 06:35:39
Right and consider that Userbench also lists an i3-8350k as 3% faster than the Ryzen 7 2700X because it has an idiotic weighted scoring system:

40% single core
58% quad core
2% multi core (more than quad)

Interesting how that caters more to the lower-thread Intel chips. Factor that in first before posting these articles please.

I have not factored in the overall weighting because of the issues you described. Instead, I have just based comparisons on individual single, quad and multi core scores.