News:

Willkommen im Notebookcheck.com Forum! Hier können sie über alle unsere Artikel und allgemein über Notebook relevante Dinge disuktieren. Viel Spass!

Main Menu

Post reply

The message has the following error or errors that must be corrected before continuing:
Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.
Other options
Verification:
Please leave this box empty:

Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by ED
 - July 22, 2019, 17:49:05
Or maybe Moore's law has always been just a marketing tool for planned obsolescence, not necessary when you can inflate prices in absence of competition or when planned obsolescence is provided courtesy of unpatched firmware vulnerabilities. Right Intel?
Posted by Redaktion
 - July 21, 2019, 19:34:14
Intel CEO Bob Swan admitted that the company was over-ambitious in its quest to have more transistor density in 10nm than Moore's Law actually postulates. This led to delays in 10nm production and ultimately, the company lagged behind competitors such as AMD and NVIDIA who have now moved on to newer fabrication processes by outsourcing chip production.

https://www.notebookcheck.net/Intel-admits-over-ambition-led-to-delays-in-10nm-chip-production-but-feels-Moore-s-Law-is-not-dead-yet.427896.0.html