News:

Willkommen im Notebookcheck.com Forum! Hier können sie über alle unsere Artikel und allgemein über Notebook relevante Dinge disuktieren. Viel Spass!

Main Menu

Post reply

The message has the following error or errors that must be corrected before continuing:
Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.
Other options
Verification:
Please leave this box empty:

Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by x64436443
 - July 29, 2019, 08:04:49
They tested and compare CPU with all patches applied and HT disabled or not? For my point of view, Intel created a new paper premiere and didn't inform about security issues and impact on raw performance.

Some time ago we have "training and presentation on new Xeon family and solution Optane by Intel" - they ask us to not record or distribute information. They tried to encourage us to think all security holes are only nuisance problem and don't concern majority. Also, the press wants to find sensation nothing more, but when we pointed out that even VMware warning about security flaws they quick changed topic...

Intel oversleep, now they have only NIC and memory department and products that distinguish on market.


Posted by bzygzy
 - July 16, 2019, 23:54:05
And now 8265C has only 7386 pts on passmark... how convenient ...
Posted by Astar
 - June 17, 2019, 20:14:14
Why is Notebookchat complicit with Intel's same old dirty tricks?

Intel's latest CPU beating AMD's previous gen Ryzen? When the new gen Ryzen is already out... conveniently saying that the Ryzen 5 3500U is "not in the database"?

Further... Did I read that correctly? The Intel is 65W while the Ryzen is 15W?!?!
Posted by Bob the builder
 - June 17, 2019, 00:38:12
Did the author of this article thought through what he even wanted to write about? All I read was " ifs,maybes and could, based on something and nothing" If dog has noting to do he licks his balls.
Posted by Gere
 - June 15, 2019, 18:16:58
Look it may rate higher, but i5 for me its one month paychesk n that is just for the processor.. If I can play games well enough with ryzen in an affordable prize, I'd go with that
Posted by Fake news
 - June 15, 2019, 12:48:59
Fake news!  Shorts must die a painful death
Posted by Mehdi
 - June 15, 2019, 07:39:09
Ryzen 5 3500U is available on UserBenchmark. Comparison link between 3500U & 8265UC:
cpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/Intel-Core-i5-8265UC-vs-AMD-Ryzen-5-2500U/m822560vsm760067
Posted by Redaktion
 - June 15, 2019, 01:41:35
The mysterious Intel Core i5-8265UC processor has reared its head again, and this time it has done so in some style. The chip has been spotted on numerous benchmarks and has performed well in all of them, outpacing both AMD's Ryzen 5 2500U and Ryzen 5 3500U in some cases. Intel's processor offers four cores and eight threads for CPU performance.

https://www.notebookcheck.net/Return-of-Intel-Core-i5-8265UC-impresses-on-Geekbench-and-UserBenchmark-rated-higher-than-AMD-s-Ryzen-5-3500U-on-PassMark.423983.0.html