News:

Willkommen im Notebookcheck.com Forum! Hier können sie über alle unsere Artikel und allgemein über Notebook relevante Dinge disuktieren. Viel Spass!

Main Menu

Post reply

The message has the following error or errors that must be corrected before continuing:
Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.
Other options
Verification:
Please leave this box empty:

Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by Codrut Nistor
 - February 02, 2019, 16:13:06
Quote from: Glorious 60fps on February 01, 2019, 08:09:03
Quote from: Codrut Nistor on February 01, 2019, 07:25:51
What if AMD ends up making more than 5,000 and the driver optimizations push them 15-20% faster?

Driver optimization doesn't push 15-20%. It increases highest 5-7%. And AMD's driver support is broken already.
Add factory overclocking to driver optimizations and you get AT LEAST 15 percent no matter what.
Posted by VegaII
 - February 01, 2019, 22:17:58
Judging by the specs a 64 CU version could be giving the 2080ti a run for it's money in 4K. Not a smart commercial move, no money in it, AMD would be chucking too many cards away on an "early" 7nm node which is obviously why they went for a 60CU version of 7nm Vega whilst still just about breaking even just to hit the 2080ti. What's exciting is if this is a success we may yet get to see that a 64CU 7nm Radeon 7. Good to see Nvidia have some competition and Nvidia must be worried as their business model isn't panning out whilst AMDs is.
Posted by ryan
 - February 01, 2019, 19:26:11
Quote from: Glorious 60fps on February 01, 2019, 08:09:03
Quote from: Codrut Nistor on February 01, 2019, 07:25:51
What if AMD ends up making more than 5,000 and the driver optimizations push them 15-20% faster?

Driver optimization doesn't push 15-20%. It increases highest 5-7%. And AMD's driver support is broken already.

Whats broken? Last driver update my 580 found an uplift in games that werent listed even. You dont use one so maybe you dont know what youre talking about?
Posted by Glorious 60fps
 - February 01, 2019, 08:09:03
Quote from: Codrut Nistor on February 01, 2019, 07:25:51
What if AMD ends up making more than 5,000 and the driver optimizations push them 15-20% faster?

Driver optimization doesn't push 15-20%. It increases highest 5-7%. And AMD's driver support is broken already.
Posted by Codrut Nistor
 - February 01, 2019, 07:25:51
What if AMD ends up making more than 5,000 and the driver optimizations push them 15-20% faster?
Posted by van
 - January 31, 2019, 21:37:01
didn't AMD say they were only making 5k of these and they are selling them at a loss? sounds like a great strategy to unseat nvidia
Posted by Glorious 60fps
 - January 31, 2019, 16:48:57
It's not a reason enough to get worried since they both cost the same and nvidia has rt core and tensor core that AMD doesn't have. Still overall,rtx 2080 is a better choice tbh.
Posted by Redaktion
 - January 31, 2019, 08:48:14
Although it cannot match the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 in Final Fantasy 15 — a title that features some technologies exclusive to the RTX series — the AMD Radeon VII appears to be a much better choice for 4K gaming, scoring higher than its competitor in the Fire Strike Ultra benchmark. The Radeon VII will hit the market on February 7.

https://www.notebookcheck.net/NVIDIA-should-worry-The-AMD-Radeon-VII-is-faster-than-the-GeForce-RTX-2080-according-to-leaked-3DMark-results.402106.0.html