News:

Willkommen im Notebookcheck.com Forum! Hier können sie über alle unsere Artikel und allgemein über Notebook relevante Dinge disuktieren. Viel Spass!

Main Menu

Post reply

The message has the following error or errors that must be corrected before continuing:
Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.
Other options
Verification:
Please leave this box empty:

Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by S.Yu
 - September 01, 2018, 04:37:34
IMO if you were gonna buy a high end graphics card anyway then being able to run the latest effects i.e. ray tracing matters.
Also I don't suppose a 1080 could match a 2070 in efficiency or low pricing even though performance could match?
Posted by DF
 - September 01, 2018, 00:06:02
It's going to be interesting when we take AA out of the equation entirely just how much faster the new chips are.  At 27-32" 4k doesn't really need AA.  It just needs pixel throughput.  That is for most buyers, the real number they care about.  If it doesn't deliver, and cost effectively, then potential buyers will ignore the new chips.
Posted by Redaktion
 - August 31, 2018, 23:44:17
Asked about the raw gaming performance in current games, Nvidia's Director of Technical Marketing Tom Petersen stated that the new RTX 2000 GPUs are between 355 and 45% faster than the Pascal cards. However, upcoming games may perform better if they are specifically coded to take advantage of the new Turing Tensor cores that facilitate the DLSS tech.

https://www.notebookcheck.net/Nvidia-official-says-the-RTX-20xx-cards-are-at-best-45-faster-than-the-Pascal-counterparts.328192.0.html