News:

Willkommen im Notebookcheck.com Forum! Hier können sie über alle unsere Artikel und allgemein über Notebook relevante Dinge disuktieren. Viel Spass!

Main Menu

Post reply

The message has the following error or errors that must be corrected before continuing:
Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.
Other options
Verification:
Please leave this box empty:

Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by Judah's Lion
 - August 02, 2016, 17:33:15
Excellent Comment GAS, so which gaming laptop model do you currently prefer? Thanks.

Quote from: Extreme Laptop! on July 15, 2016, 07:12:24
Wow, this really is an extreme laptop!

I noticed from the GPU graphs within GPUz in your Heaven benchmark screenshots - the GPUs are only at about 50% load each while framerate is 200+.  What is happening here is that the graphics settings you've chosen are not hard enough for the GPUs, therefore the framerate is too high & the CPU/platform becomes the bottleneck at 200+ framerate.  Your Heaven benchmark test would have been far more useful if you had customized the settings within Heaven benchmark to run at Extreme Tessellation and perhaps with more AA levels in order to push the GPUs to their limits (e.g. 100% load on each GPU) - this would make the temperatures and clock rates seen on the GPUs more valid - to verify that temperatures are good and clock rates stable.  I've seen this in other reviews on this site, increase the graphics settings within Heaven benchmark to push the GPUs harder, at the moment you have a CPU limited scenario with your current settings.
Posted by saaya
 - July 19, 2016, 10:53:14
@ jt AJ, its a PREview, they mention it a couple of times :)
I think only competitors like MSI and Gigabyte care about the internal layout
They do talk about storage, and they tested it... not sure what you mean
Posted by jt AJ
 - July 15, 2016, 22:42:54
this review is really disappointing, it doesnt show us internal difference from gx700 and i wish to see internal design of gx800.  also doesnt talk about storage, how many more 2.5" compared to gx700 etc, very disappoint in notebookcheck.
Posted by Extreme Laptop!
 - July 15, 2016, 07:12:24
Wow, this really is an extreme laptop!

I noticed from the GPU graphs within GPUz in your Heaven benchmark screenshots - the GPUs are only at about 50% load each while framerate is 200+.  What is happening here is that the graphics settings you've chosen are not hard enough for the GPUs, therefore the framerate is too high & the CPU/platform becomes the bottleneck at 200+ framerate.  Your Heaven benchmark test would have been far more useful if you had customized the settings within Heaven benchmark to run at Extreme Tessellation and perhaps with more AA levels in order to push the GPUs to their limits (e.g. 100% load on each GPU) - this would make the temperatures and clock rates seen on the GPUs more valid - to verify that temperatures are good and clock rates stable.  I've seen this in other reviews on this site, increase the graphics settings within Heaven benchmark to push the GPUs harder, at the moment you have a CPU limited scenario with your current settings.
Posted by Redaktion
 - July 15, 2016, 05:20:17
Prestige object. We are one of the first editorial offices with the chance to have a close look at the upcoming GX800. Compared to the predecessor, Asus does not only increase the performance and the dimensions, but also equips the device with a 4K display and G-Sync support. Can the cooling system handle the components? Our preview answers initial questions.

http://www.notebookcheck.net/Asus-ROG-GX800-Notebook-Preview.169306.0.html